本研究主要在探討應用電腦資訊科技實施輔助教學時,電腦模擬系統的學習方式及影響的關鍵要素,本研究的方式是除了藉由相關文獻蒐集整理,並透過專家訪談的方式,利用開放式問卷對具有交換機專長領域的專家實施問卷式的訪談,以求得各專家對本研究所需考量的因素提供要點,經統計及分析「交換機模擬輔助軟體」開發時所需考量之重要因素構面有以下四點:系統操作性層面、系統功能性層面、教學性層面、周邊輔助層面。 在受訪者對交換機電腦模擬系統最佳學習方式評量結果的過程中,所考量的主因素以系統操作性為最大考量,次因素則分別在系統操作性層面上以直覺式的操作流程、系統功能性層面上以功能正常使用(穩定性)、教學性層面上以重要而即時的教學說明以及在周邊輔助層面上以教學人員從旁輔導為最重因素;所以經本研究分析得知學習關鍵要素共有四項,依其重要優先順序為1.直覺式的操作流程。2.易於操作的使用介面。3.教學人員從旁輔導。4.重要而即時的教學說明。 另外並針對不同族群的使用者實施問卷調查且應用AHP方案評選出最適合的學習模式,經研究結果得知:完全使用模擬系統之學習模式為第一首選、其次為混合學習模式,最後為傳統學習模式,可見既始在不同使用者考量下,對交換機學習者而言使用電腦模擬系統學習仍為較佳之學習選擇方式。
The purpose of this research is to discuss the critical factors of Computer Simulation System Learning. The reason for designs a computer simulation system that it play an important role in multimedia learning. The learning technique and influential elements are deserved further discussion and research. The approach of this research is to find out the critical elements with documents rearrangement, specialists consultant and survey for the specialist in switch relative field. After calculation and analysis, we concluded that the four critical factors, which should be considered while developing “Switch simulation assistant software”, are system manipulation level, system function level and periphery assistant level. Among the evaluation results of the best learning mode, system manipulation would be first concerned primary factor, and the subsequent factors are instinctive operation process for system manipulation, function stability for system function, important and immediately illustration of teaching for instruction and assistance of teaching staff for around assistance. Therefore, total four learning critical factors as developing Computer Simulation System Software can be obtained in this study. According to the results, the sequences of factors are 1.instinctive operation process, 2.function stability, and 3.immediately illustration of teaching, 4.assistance of teaching staff. Besides, we apply survey for users with different background and AHP plan to evaluate suitable learning mode, and priority of primary and secondary factors. The result comes out best for totally using simulator, second for partly using simulator (mixed learning mode), and worst for not using simulator (traditional learning mode).