當一處古蹟經過研究調查、解體調查、規劃設計、修復到周邊環境整理復原工程完成時,也就是將施工紀錄經由撰寫過程轉化成為工作報告書,到工作報告書的印刷完成,整個修復工程才能算是完全的結束。也正因施工紀錄清楚的紀錄各種調查資料、施工過程的技術以及所有涵括事務的處理過程等,工作報告書才會顯得如此重要。因此施工紀錄的真實性與否,也就代表修復技術的累積能否被忠實的傳達延續,故施工紀錄已不止是施工過程紀錄而已。本文主旨在於研究臺灣法定之建築文化資產,亦即《文化資產保存法》所稱之古蹟,在於進行修復工程時,由行政體系委託執行體系進行「施工紀錄」之工作,再由「施工紀錄」經撰寫編輯所轉化出版之「工作報告書」,分析臺灣古蹟修復於行政體系、執行體系、觀念上之問題探討及提出建議。各章節所呈現之內容為: 第二章 建築文化資產修復施工紀錄之發展: 探討西方紀錄理論之理論基礎、以及東方日本木造建築施工紀錄理論之立論點,檢討臺灣對古蹟修復施工紀錄之作法及立論之初構。 第三章 臺灣古蹟保存修復之現況: 以臺灣建築文化資產保存修復行政體系及執行體系之現況,探討修復工程之商業化,及與日本國家文化財建造物之比較。 第四章 臺灣古蹟修復工程施工紀錄之分析評估: 以民國71年、73年、90年之法令制定為分期點,探討各分期點委託「施工紀錄」行政、執行方式,對於工作報告書之構成及內容所造成之影響提出問題點。 第五章 結論與建議: 針對上述對施工紀錄之理論建立、現況說明、分析探討之後,對於台灣古蹟修復執行「施工紀錄」以及「工作報告書」之問題點,提出對策及建議作為結論。
Only when a monument is from researched and investigated, disassembled and survey, planned and designed, repaired, to finished the recovery works of surroundings, as well as a works report is from composed process, documenting converted to works report, to finished printing, the whole repair works can be taken as a fully end. Since documenting is recorded various investigated data, technique of construction process, and all procedure of other affairs, a works report appears its importance. A documenting is true or not, will show if accumulation of repair technique can be spread faithfully. That is why a documenting is not just a record of construction process. The substance of this essay is to study the legal constructional & cultural property in Taiwan, namely the monument called in “Cultural Property Preservation Law”. When a monument is carried repairs work out, the administration system authorize execution system to process a “documenting”, and through composed and edited, a “documenting” is convert to a publishable “works report”. Besides, this essay is also included an analysis of Taiwan’s monuments repair in administration system, execution system, and a suggestions for some conceptual questions. Summary of each chapter are as follows: Chapter 2 Development Stage of Constructional & Cultural Property Repaired Documenting; To probe into the base of western documentation theory and eastern Japanese wood-made construction documenting, to review the way for monument repaired documenting and to pre-compose the theory. Chapter 3 Current Constructional & Culture Property Reservation in Taiwan: With current administration system and execution system of constructional & cultural property repaired in Taiwan, to analyze the commercialization of repair works, and to compared with Japanese national cultural property construction. Chapter 4 Analyze and Evaluate Documenting of Taiwanese Monumental Repairs Works: Using the year 1982, 1984 and 2001, which regulatory was set up, as a divided stage point, to analyze authorized “documenting” administration and execution mode in each stage, and to address questions for the effect caused by structure and content of works report. Chapter 5 Conclusion and Suggestion: After theory set-up, current status, and analyses of documenting as above, to provide solutions and suggestions for the question of Taiwan monument repaired executive “documenting” and “works report” as a conclusion.