國中生知覺教師家長式領導、幸福感與學習態度關係之研究-以桃園市為例

A Study of the Relationship among Junior High School Students’ Perceptions of Teacher’s Paternalistic Leadership, Well-Being and Learning Attitudes: Taoyuan City as an Example

黃媺軒(Mei-Hsuan Huang)

指導教授 ： 楊慶麟

中原大學/人文與教育學院/教育研究所/碩士(2015年)

https://doi.org/10.6840/CYCU.2015.00162

摘要

本研究旨在探討桃園市國中學生知覺教師家長式領導、幸福感與學習態度之現況，並分析不同背景變項之差異、相關、預測情形，並瞭解三者因果關係及桃園市各行政區在上述變項得分群聚情形。本研究採取的研究方法為混合方法研究，包含問卷調查法與訪談法，以103學年度桃園市60所公立國民中學，共74244位普通班學生作為本研究母群體，分層隨機抽取1087位學生為研究樣本，以「國中生知覺教師家長式領導、幸福感與學習態度問卷」為研究工具實施調查。資料處理以描述性統計、t考驗、單因子變異數分析、皮爾遜積差相關、多元迴歸分析法、結構方程式以及集群分析法等統計方法進行資料分析。此外，訪談12位學生、教師及家長，來補足量化研究。本研究結果歸納如下：
一、桃園市國中生知覺教師家長式領導、幸福感與學習態度之現況良好。
二、不同背景變項之受試者對知覺教師家長式領導、幸福感與學習態度知覺有所差異。
三、知覺教師家長式領導、幸福感與學習態度呈現高度正相關。
四、知覺教師家長式領導、幸福感對學習態度具有預測力。
五、知覺教師家長式領導、幸福感與學習態度三者之間，幸福感對知覺教師家長式領導與學習態度不具有中介效果。
六、桃園市各行政區國民中學在知覺教師家長式領導、幸福感與學習態度有群聚關係，以分為三組為佳。
七、以訪談研究結果探索量化研究之差異原因。

最後，本研究依據上述結果，提出相關建議，俾供教育行政機關、各學校與教師，以及後續研究者參考。

關鍵字

教師家長式領導 ； 學習態度 ； 幸福感

並列摘要

This study is aimed to explore the current situation, different background variables, correlations, forecast, and intermediary effect among students’ perceptions of teacher’s paternalistic leadership, well-being and learning attitudes of public junior high schools in Taoyuan City. The method, involving the questionnaire survey and semi-structured interview, is mixed methods research. The approach in this study adopts questionnaires and uses stratified random sampling to investigate 1087 samples that are from 60 schools. Collected data are analyzed by the statistical methods of descriptive statistics, independent t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson correlation, multiple regression, SEM and cluster analysis. Besides, In order to strengthen the research, select ten people to interview. The results can be concluded as follows:
1. Perceptions of teacher’s paternalistic leadership, well-being and learning attitudes perceived by the students from public junior high schools in Taoyuan City are significantly above theoretical average.
2. Students with different background variables have significantly different perception in perceptions of teacher’s paternalistic leadership, well-being and learning attitudes.
3. There is a high correlation between every two variables of perceptions of teacher’s paternalistic leadership, well-being and learning attitudes.
4. Perceptions of teacher’s paternalistic leadership and well-being have the significant prediction toward learning attitudes.
5. “Well-being” is not a moderate variable between perceptions of teacher’s paternalistic leadership and learning attitudes.
6. Junior high school students of 13 districs in Taoyuan City, their three variable scores, perceptions of teacher’s paternalistic leadership, well-being and learning attitudes , have a cluster relationship, and they may be better to divide into three groups in this research.
7. Explore the difference causes of quantitative research through the results of qualitative research.
Finally, the study will offer suggestions for the educational administrative institutions, junior high schools and teachers, and future researchers.

並列關鍵字

teacher’s paternalistic leadership ； well-being ； learning attitudes

參考文獻

王怡云（2005）。學校組織中的家長式領導－以一個幼稚園為例。家政教育學報，7，55-79。

吳尉嘉（2010）。國小教師知覺校長家長式領導與組織公民行為關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立屏東教育大學，屏東縣。

邢占軍（2005）。對主觀幸福感測量的反思。本土心理學研究，24 ，301-323。

林志興（2009）。家長式領導對學校領導之啟示。學校行政雙月刊，63，36-46。

林惠雅、林麗玲（2008）。青少年知覺之家人關係型態與幸福感。本土心理學研究，30，199-241。