- 學位論文
得榮基金會生命教育的運作與推廣
The Practice and Promotion of Life Education: A Case Study on Glory Foundation
摘要
得榮社會福利基金會成立於1997年，是召會體系內出現的第一個社福機構，主要從事生命教育相關的各項工作，對於向來不參與社會事務的召會體系而言，具有特別的意義。得榮基金會本著基督徒榮神益人的精神，配合政府教育當局推動「生命教育」的政策，編輯教材、訓練志工、至各機關團體學校社區等處推廣生命教育，回應了社會大眾在生命教育方面的需求。 本論文研究得榮基金會這十多年來在生命教育的領域中如何運作。第一章將教育部推行生命教育的理念與課程中欲培養青少年生命教育的核心能力做一闡述，其次說明得榮基金會的成立、召會對其之觀點、基金會的改組轉型過程，並將教育部與基金會二者生命教育理念作一比較。 第二章探討得榮基金會以召會基督徒的立場來從事生命教育工作，如何在教材中融入召會的神學觀點。第三章說明得榮基金會以召會人力為主要志工來源，對於志工訓練內容及志工與基金會關係作一瞭解，另外也說明基金會的教案結構、班級教學所遇到的問題、大學生如何加入志工行列、得榮基金會與得勝者協會生命教育事工比較等議題，及介紹得榮基金會的「得榮少年」教育專案。 結語中，筆者也將討論與得榮基金會息息相關的召會體系，其二者間互為表裡的關係，對基金會產生的幫助與限制。 筆者認為得榮基金會對社會的貢獻值得肯定，其所奠基的召會體系在台灣的基督教團體中，其人力資源及財力都是較為豐沛的，期盼得榮基金會能在此基礎上繼續推廣生命教育事工，以營造出更多全人教育的健康環境回饋社會。
並列摘要
Glory Foundation was founded in 1997 as the first social welfare organization emerging in the Local Church system, devoted mainly to life education-related works. For the Local Church system which conventionally has avoided involving in social affairs, the appearance of Glory Foundation carries a special meaning. Based on Christians’ spirit of glorifying God and benefitting people, Glory Foundation in compliance with the educational authorities’ policy on life education, compiles teaching materials, trains voluntary workers, and promotes life education in governmental institutions, organizations, schools, communities etc., responding to the need of life education for the general public. This thesis studies the practices of Glory Foundation for more than ten years in the field of life education. Chapter One elaborates the Department of Education’s idea on life education and core abilities intended to be built up in teenagers through the curriculum. Next the founding of Glory Foundation, the Local Church system’s perspective, and the re-organizing of the Foundation are described. A comparison is made regarding the ideas on life education between the Department of Education and Glory Foundation. In Chapter Two, we examine how Glory Foundation as a Christian organization for life education, infuses the Local Church’s theology into the teaching materials. From the fact that most Foundation’s voluntary workers are from the Local Church system, Chapter Three describe the volunteers training programming and relation between voluntary workers and the Foundation. Moreover, other topics such as the structure of the teaching plans, difficulties encountered in class, how college students joining the volunteers group, and the differences in life education practices between Glory Foundation and Champions Education Association, R.O.C. are stated. Lastly, the Glory Foundation Youth Project is also addressed. In Closing Remarks, the author will discuss the correlation between Glory Foundation and the intimate partner－the Local Church system, and hence the associated assistance and limitation for the Foundation. The author would like to applaud for Glory Foundation’s contribution to the society. The Local Church system in which the Foundation is rooted contains more abundant human and financial resources among Christian groups. It is the author’s sincere wish that Glory Foundation being on such a concrete base could keep promoting all kinds of life education works, that more healthy environments for holistic education can be constructed as a feedback to the society.