透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.15.174.76
  • 學位論文

國中教師教學風格、學生學習動機與英語科學習成就之關聯性研究-以桃園縣為例

The Study of Relationships among Secondary Teachers’ Teaching Styles, Students’ Learning Motivation and English Academic Achievement - Taoyuan County as an Example

指導教授 : 張淑慧

摘要


本研究主要在探討國中教師教學風格、學生學習動機與英語科學習成就三者之間的關聯性。本研究採用問卷調查法,調查的對象為桃園縣公立國中九年級的學生,問卷回收率為96.3%,其中有效樣本數為832份。使用工具為「教師教學風格量表」與「學生學習動機量表」。經卡方百分比同質性檢定、t檢定、單因子變異數分析、皮爾森積差相關、逐步多元迴歸分析及淨相關,得致以下結果: 一、學生所知覺的教師教學風格以「教師主導型」的比例最高,「探索學習型」的比例最低。 二、不同背景變項的學生所知覺的教師教學風格未達顯著差異。 三、不同背景變項的學生在學習動機上有顯著差異。 四、不同背景變項的學生在學習成就上有顯著差異。 五、教師教學風格、學生學習動機與學習成就之間具有顯著正相關存在。 六、教師教學風格與學生學習動機對學習成就具有顯著預測力。 七、學生學習動機是教師教學風格與學生學習成就之間的中介變項。

並列摘要


The purpose of this study was to explore the relationships among secondary teachers’ styles, students’ learning motivation and English academic achievement. The samples were ninth-grade students from public secondary schools in Taoyuan County. The return rate was 96.3% and valid samples were 832. The questionnaire was constructed into two subsets: teachers’ teaching styles and students’ learning motivation. The statistics used in this study were chi-square, t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson product-moment correlation, stepwise multiple regression and partial correlation. The major conclusions of this study were summarized as follows: 1. Most students perceived their teachers’ teaching styles were teacher-directed style, whereas exploring-learning style was the least perceived by the students. 2. There were no significant differences between teachers’ teaching styles perceived by students with different background variables. 3. There were significant differences of learning motivation between different groups of students with different background variables. 4. There were significant differences of academic achievement between different groups of students with different background variables. 5. There were positive significant correlations between teachers’ teaching styles, students’ learning motivation and students’ academic achievement . 6. Students’ academic achievement could be predicted by teachers’ teaching styles and students’ learning motivation. 7. Students’ learning motivation was a significant mediator between teachers’ teaching styles and students’ academic achievement. Based on the results of the study, some suggestions were proposed for educational administrators, school administrators, and teachers.

參考文獻


王珩(2005)。國小英語教師學習與教學風格之研究。臺中教育大學學報,19(2),71-88。
張景媛(1988)。教學類型與學習類型適配性研究暨學生學習適應理論模式的驗證。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
陳榮華(1995)。試辦綜合高中之檢討與建議。技術及職業教育,30,13。
郭生玉(1999)。心理與教育測驗。台北:精華。
Chang, D.Y. (2003). English language learning strategies and styles preference of traditional and nontraditional students in Taiwan. Dissertation. The University of South Dakota.

被引用紀錄


李雅蕙(2020)。不同背景變項對於國小教師教學風格與學生學習態度之研究__以新北市中和區為例〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2020.00039
顏昌輝(2017)。國中生閱讀策略使用、正向班級氣氛與學習動機關係之研究─以桃園市為例〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu201700182
周盈萱(2016)。從韓國文化價值觀探討韓籍大專生學習漢語動機以促進其自律學習研究〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu201600016
謝曜營(2015)。小組遊戲競賽合作學習法對低成就生英語學習動機與學習成就之影響 —以桃園縣某私立高職為例〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu201500636
江仁山(2014)。國中生英語補救教學學習動機與學習成效關係之研究 -以新竹市「補救教學實施方案」為例〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu201400206

延伸閱讀