透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.219.95.244
  • 學位論文

國中教師對十二年國教升學制度與考試方式的因應策略分析

The Analysis of Junior High School Teachers' Coping Strategies on the Education Admission System and Examinations of 12-Year Basic Education

指導教授 : 張鈿富
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


本研究之主要目的在瞭解國中教師對於十二年國教的升學制度以及考試方式的因應措施。本研究係以台灣地區今年度有參加特色招生的七個就學區的國中教師為研究對象,共選取500位教師為正式樣本,以現況調查為目的設計問卷作調查。之後以 SPSS of Windows 統計軟體進行數據分析,包括有描敘統計、獨立樣本t考驗、單因子變異數分析和次數統計等。本研究結果歸納出以下幾點結論: 一、有兼任導師或行政工作的教師對升學制度與考試方式較為瞭解; 二、任教於考試科目的教師對升學制度與考試方式較為瞭解; 三、十二年國教對於偏鄉地區學生較不合理; 四、升學輔導時應將相關數據做分析並粗略介紹大學多元入學方式; 五、考試期程與招生名額比例影響正常教學。   最後,本研究將對教育主管機關、學校行政人員、學校教師和未來的研究者分別提出如何因應十二年國教升學制度和考試方式的相關建議。

並列摘要


This study aims to explore the junior high school teachers' coping strategies for the educational admission system and examinations of 12-year basic education. With the 500 junior high school teachers in 7 school districts where the specialized programs of admission is launched as research subjects, this study collected relevant data by self-designed questionnaire on the purpose of investigation. “SPSS for windows” was used for analyzing the data through the following methods including Descriptive Statistics, Independent-Samples t Test, One way ANOVA, Frequency Statistics. The results are as follows: 1. Teachers who work as homeroom teachers tend to have better understanding about the selective education system and regulations. 2. Teachers who teach major subjects tend to have better understanding about the selective education system and regulations. 3. Twelve-year basic education tends to be less reasonable for students in remote areas. 4. Relevant data should be analyzed and multiple entrance programs should be introduced in the period of facilitating admission. 5. The schedule of examinations and the enrolling apportionment affects the way of schooling. Finally, the related suggestions derived from previous discussions are presented respectively for education authority, school staff, school teachers, and future researcher to have better coping strategies to the educational admission system and examinations of 12-year basic education

參考文獻


易正義(2008)。民國初年學制改革的經過。亞東學報,28,151-160。
大學招生委員會聯合會(2010)。大學甄選委員會網站。擷取自https://www.caac.ccu.edu.tw/cacportal/index.php
大學術科考試委員會聯合會(2005)。大學術科考試委員會聯合會。擷取自http://www.cape.edu.tw/
大學繁星計畫彙辦中心(2009)。99學年度教育部大學繁星計畫網站。擷取自http://www.star.ccu.edu.tw/star99/index.php
王文科、王智弘(2005)。教育研究法。台北:五南。

被引用紀錄


朱念伶(2017)。新北市國民中學協助弱勢學生升學相關措施之研究-教師觀點之分析〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2017.00353
陳珊怡(2016)。十二年國教下國中生涯輔導課程對學生生涯自我探索之研究〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2016.00352

延伸閱讀