實踐非單一伴侶制度男同志之成人依附關係與愛情關係滿意度的相關研究

基於國內尚未有實踐非典型親密關係男同志的量化研究，本研究旨在探討台灣具親密關係之男同志的關係型態、成人依附風格以及愛情關係滿意度之現況，進而探討不同背景變項之男同志，其成人依附關係與愛情關係滿意度之差異，並分析各變項與愛情關係滿意度之關係，最後分析各變項對愛情關係滿意度之預測力。研究對象為18歲以上居住於台灣、自我認同為男同志並具有親密關係伴侶者。本研究使用人際依附風格量表、關係評估量表作為測量工具，共取得有效樣本874份。研究資料方式運用描述統計、皮爾森卡方分析、獨立樣本t檢定、單因子變異數分析、皮爾森相關分析、線性迴歸以及多元迴歸以進行統計分析，研究結果如下：一、於874份樣本中，近半數（46.2%）之男同志實踐CNM，包含：開放式關係、多重伴侶關係、伴侶交換以及其他型態之親密關係，顯示了台灣男同志實踐CNM的普遍性。二、實踐不同親密關係形態之男同志，與其愛情關係滿意度並無顯著差異，此意味著無論男同志實踐何種親密關係形態，皆具同樣良好的愛情關係滿意度。三、具不同成人依附風格之男同志，與其愛情關係滿意度並無顯著差異，此意味著無論男同志傾向於何種依附風格，皆具同樣良好的愛情關係滿意度。四、基於成人依附風格分數的高低與實踐封閉或CNM之比例沒有差異，此代表不得因個人之成人依附風格分數而推測男同志實踐何種親密關係型態。五、隨著交往時間推進，實踐CNM之男同志比例增加，實踐封閉式關係比例減少。此外，實踐CNM之男同志其交往時間顯著大於實踐封閉式關係的男同志。綜合上述兩點，CNM可能為男同志伴侶提升關係滿意度以及延展交往時間的策略，或為原持原本親密關係的作法。六、實踐開放式關係之男同志，其年齡顯著大於實踐封閉式關係的男同志。此意味著較年長的男同志更有可能實踐開放式關係。七、傾向於焦慮型依附的男同志在「較小的年齡、較低的教育程度以及較低的收入」有較高的比例。八、男同志的愛情關係滿意度可受到交往時間以及安全型依附分數正向預測。最後，本研究以研究結果為基礎，進一步對未來研究方向及實務工作提出建議，供主管機關及助人工作者參考。

關鍵字

男同志；開放式關係；知情同意的非單一伴侶制；成人依附風格；愛情關係滿意度

並列摘要

Based on the lack of quantitative studies on atypical intimate relationships among gay men in Taiwan, this study aimed to investigate the current status of relationship types, adult attachment styles, and relationship satisfaction among gay men with intimate relationships in Taiwan. The study also examined the relationship between each variable and relationship satisfaction, and examined the predictive power of each variable on relationship satisfaction. The study population was people over the age of 18 who lived in Taiwan, who self-identified as gay men, and were having intimate relationship partners. The sample consisted of 874 valid samples. The instruments applied were Attachment Style Scale, and Relationship Assessment Scale(RAS). Descriptive statistics, Pearson's chi-square analysis, independent sample t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson's correlation analysis, linear regression and multiple regression were used to conduct statistical analysis. The results were as follows: 1.Among the 874 samples, nearly half (46.2%) of the gay men practiced CNM, including open relationships, polyamory, swinging, and other types of intimate relationships, indicating the prevalence of CNM among gay men in Taiwan. 2.Gay men who practice different forms of intimacy have no significant difference in their love relationship satisfaction, which means regardless of the type of intimate relationships practiced by gay men, they all have the same level of satisfaction with their romantic relationships. 3.Gay men with different adult attachment style have no significant difference in their love relationship satisfaction, which means regardless of the attachment style of gay men, they all have the same level of satisfaction with their romantic relationships. 4.Since there was no difference between the score of adult attachment style and the percentage of practicing closed or CNM, this means that no assumptions should be made about what type of intimate relationships gay men are practicing based on their adult attachment style scores. 5.The proportion of gay men practicing CNM increased significantly as the duration of the relationship progressed, and the proportion practicing closed relationships decreased significantly. In addition, the duration of relationships for gay men practicing CNM was significantly longer than those practicing closed relationships. Combining the above two points, CNM may be a strategy for gay couples to improve relationship satisfaction and extend the duration of their relationships, or it may be a strategy for maintaining the original intimate relationship. 6.Gay men who practice open relationships are significantly older than those who practice closed relationships. This means that elder gay men are more likely to practice open relationships. 7.Gay men who are anxiously attached tend to have a higher proportion of "younger age, lower education, and lower income". 8.Gay men's relationship satisfaction can be positively predicted by relationship duration and the score of secure attachment. Finally, according to the findings, some suggestions are provided for gay men, practitioners and future research.