多元智能寫作教學方案對國小六年級學童英文寫作能力、寫作態度、創造力與創造性傾向之影響

The Effects on Sixth-Grade Elementary School Students’ English Writing Ability, Attitude, Creativity, and Creative Tendency through Multiple Intelligence Teaching Method in Writing

徐毓苓

指導教授 ： 潘裕豐博士

國立臺灣師範大學/教育學院/創造力發展碩士在職專班/碩士(2009年)

摘要

本研究旨在依據「多元智能」的內涵以及國小英語教學原則，設計一套將語言、數學-邏輯、肢體動覺、音樂、空間、人際、內省、自然觀察者等八種智能融入的「多元智能寫作教學方案」，進行十次的實驗教學，探討此方案對提升國小六年級學童英文寫作能力、寫作態度、創造力及創造性傾向的成效
本研究採準實驗研究法，採立意取樣選取台北市某國小六年級學童為研究對象，隨機分派實驗組和控制組各一班。實驗組三十二名學童每週進行一次四十分鐘的「多元智能寫作教學」，共計十個單元；控制組三十三名學童則接受「一般寫作教學」。研究工具為研究者自編之「英文寫作能力測驗」、改編之「英文寫作態度量表」、「威廉斯創造性思考活動測驗」以及「威廉斯創造性傾向量表」，所得資料以獨立樣本單因子共變數分析，分別進行假設的考驗。研究結果如下：
一、實驗組學童在「英文寫作能力測驗」之得分未顯著優於控制組。
二、實驗組學童在「英文寫作態度量表」之得分未顯著優於控制組。
三、實驗組學童在創造力「開放性」、「獨創力」及「標題」三項得分顯著優
於控制組；在「流暢力」、「變通力」及「精密性」三項得分未顯著優於控制組。
四、實驗組學童在創造性傾向「冒險性」、「好奇性」、「想像力」及「挑戰性」
之得分未顯著優於控制組。
研究結果發現，十次的「多元智能寫作教學方案」，不影響國小六年級學童「英文寫作能力」、「英文寫作態度」及「創造力傾向」；但有助於部分創造力之提升。

關鍵字

多元智能 ； 英文寫作能力 ； 英文寫作態度 ； 創造力 ； 創造性傾向

並列摘要

The focuses of this study were, based on the essence of “Multiple Intelligence” and the elementary school English teaching principle, to design a “Multiple Intelligence Writing” teaching course incorporating 8 components of intelligence: linguistic, logical-mathematical, bodily-kinesthetic, musical, spatial, interpersonal, intrapersonal, and natural intelligence, and to investigate the effect on English writing ability, writing attitude, creativity, and creative tendency of sixth graders through 10 experimental teaching sessions.

The experiment adopts quasi-experiment method and utilizes judgment sampling to select one experimental group and one control group from an elementary school in Taipei. 32 students in the experimental group received ten 40-minute “Multiple Intelligence Teaching Method in Writing” sessions and 33 students in the control group received “General Teaching Method in Writing” sessions instead. The research tools used in this study include “English Writing Ability Test” developed by the author, revised “Writing Attitude Scale”, “Williams Creative Thinking Activity Testing”, and “Williams Creative Tendency Scale”. Research results were analyzed through independent sample One-way Analysis of Covariance and summarized as follow:

I. There were no significant differences between the experimental group and the control group in “English Writing Ability Test”.
II. There were no significant differences between the experimental group and the control group in “Writing Attitude Scale” results.
III. There were significant differences between the experimental group and the control group in “Openness”, “Originality”, and “Headline” of creativity, but no significant differences in “Fluency”, “Flexibility”, and “Elaboration”.
IV. There were no significant differences between the experimental group and the control group in “Risk-Taking”, “Curiosity”, “Imagination”, and “Complexity” of creative tendency.

In sum, 10 “Multiple Intelligence Teaching Method in Writing” sessions did not significantly improve sixth graders’ English writing ability, English writing attitude, and creative tendency, but showed significant improvement on some creativity attributes.

並列關鍵字

Multiple Intelligence ； English Writing Ability ； English Writing Attitude ； Creativity ； Creative Tendency

參考文獻

石素錦（1999）。從認知心理與社會互動談兒童語言發展-從皮亞傑與維高斯基理論談兒童英語教學。載於戴維揚(主編)，國民小學英語科教材教法(70-142)。臺北：文鶴。

范文芳（2001）。改進語文教學培養思辨能力。新竹師範學院語文學報，7，93-111。

教育部（2005）。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要-語文學習領域。臺北市，教育部。

陳龍安（2006）。創造思考教學的理論與實際。台北：心理。

王佩蘭（2005）。對國小高年級簡易英語故事重寫表現影響之研究。國立台北師範學院兒童英語研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。