心靈．風景---張峻輝的創作研究論述

無論在東方或西方，以自然風景素材做為繪畫創作的內容，是許多藝術家共同的喜好，以風景為題的傑作也持續不斷因應而生。本論文研究以「心靈．風景」做為主題，從風景畫的議題出發，探討風景畫的內涵及不同藝術派別在風景畫的表現形式，並從我們存在的環境切入，探索現實世界與風景的依存關係，嘗試在創作之中，表達個人對於自然風景所帶來的感動，與現存世界環境的關心。本論文創作以風景為發展主軸，思考風景繪畫的內涵層面，主要以西方的風景繪畫表現形式做為理論基礎與探討範圍，將不同時期的風景畫在美學理論、表現意涵、創作思維整理探究，做為個人創作表現形式的參考依據。人與自然的關係一直是密不可分的，因此筆者試著從環境保護的角度，來探討藝術與環境的關係，提出我們面對生態環境的態度與省思。個人一系列關於風景的繪畫創作，是源自於對風景題材的愛好、對環境的關心，同是也是一種自我探索的過程，藉由創作，不斷的思考創作的目的、藝術的意義、存在的價值，雖然不會有答案，但是經由創作過程中與自我的對話，使筆者對自己、生活、藝術產生新的體悟，也許這就是答案之外的答案。

關鍵字

心靈；風景畫；環境保護；繪畫創作

並列摘要

Whether in the Eastern or Western, to paint the nature scenery is most artists’ common preference content. As a result, the landscape masterpiece has been created continuously. In this study, spirit and landscape are the theme. First, started from the discussion of landscape, the author finds the meaning of landscape and various expression styles by the different type artists. Then, chosen the environment we are living, the author analyzes the relationship between the real world and the scenery. At last, in the personal painting, the author tries to express his feeling about nature scenery and his concern about the existing global environment. The core of this study is landscape. The author explains the meaning of landscape, and adopts the Western painting style of landscape as the theory basis and discussion domain. In addition, the author systemizes the aestheticism, the meaning and the creative thought of landscapes in different periods of art history as his painting reference. The relationship between human and nature has always been so close, so the author tries to use the environmental protection point of view to discuss the relationship between art and nature. And the author points out our attitude and self-reflection in face of the ecology. The personal painting series of landscape came from the interest on the scenery theme, the concern for the environment. In the same time, they were also a process of self-exploration. The process was keeping thinking the propose of painting, the significance of art, and the existential value during the creation period. Although there might be no answer, through the dialogue with the self in the process, the author got new understanding of self, life and art. Perhaps this was the answer than the answer.