透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.218.8.36
  • 學位論文

華裔離群對中國認識的一種途徑:以新加坡東亞所和黃朝翰為例

A Diasporic Approach to China:The Case of the East Asian Institute of Singapore and John Wong

指導教授 : 石之瑜 黃城
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


新加坡的中國研究有別於其他地區的中國研究,有其特殊的建構脈絡及歷史軌跡。事實上,在整個中國知識體系建構過程中,主政者的意志及主持中國研究者形塑了整個新加坡中國學研究特色。影響所及,政府的政策乃至於學術界的研究走向均看得見東亞所的痕跡。本文從離散理論的視角深入分析長期擔任新加坡東亞所關鍵角色-黃朝翰學術所長的著述論述與東亞所研究員的學術產出,作為呈現新加坡中國學研究的一種途徑。黃朝翰來自香港,曾身處歐美知識界,其缺乏新加坡本土性的特色,正是領導者所意欲的身分策略。而東亞所挑選的研究員,在身分上也大多具備如此特性,其知識產出提供了新加坡政府與西方學界關於中國的情報。顯見華裔離群學者處在中、西之間兩邊力量的拉扯下,的確會呈現出與單純來自中方或西方學者的不同研究視角,研究者身分的差異對於中國知識的詮釋存在分殊性,這也有助於理解方興未艾的中國研究之研究者處在不同位置與身分對「中國」理解的差異。

並列摘要


The China Studies in Singapore is distinct; it has evolved from specific historical contexts. Both political and academic leaders have played important roles in shaping China studies. The East Asian Institute is particularly critical to China Studies in Singapore. This has to do with its function as well as its leadership. This paper introduces the EAI and its leadership from a diasporic theory point of view. Specifically, Professor John Wong, together with those colleagues he has recruited and advised, represented the Singaporean style of China studies. John Wong, who came originally from Hong Kong, received his training in the West. His, as well as his colleagues’, lack of local connection fits perfectly well into Singapore’s strategic choices which are to attend closely to China’s growth, avoid ethnic sensibilities among Southeast Asian neighbors, and remain its Western outlook. The diasporic characteristics is present both in the design of the institute and the composition of its staff. By tracing the three stages in the institute’s history, the paper explains the transformation of China Studies in Singapore.

參考文獻


Wang, G.(1967)。The structure of power in north china during the five dynasties。Stanford, Calif. ::Stanford University Press。
張錦忠(2004)。文化回歸、離散台灣與旅行跨國性:「在台馬華文學」的案例。中外文學,33(7),14。
以黃朝翰(john wong)和廖建裕(leo suryadinata)為例。台灣東南亞學刊,7。
Borjas, G. J.、Freeman, R. B.(1992)。Immigration and the work force : Economic consequences for the united states and source areas。Chicag:University of Chicago Press。
CAO, b. C.(2004)。Sars: “waterloo” of chinese science。China: An International Journal,2(2),262-286。

被引用紀錄


林凱蒂(2013)。中華文明的反共敘事:耶穌會《中國新聞分析》〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2013.00148

延伸閱讀