透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.144.193.129
  • 學位論文

大學學生宿舍自治組織幹部暨同儕輔導員角色認同與實踐之研究

The Self-governance Group’s and The Peer Consolers’ Role-Identity and

指導教授 : 張雪梅
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


本研究旨在瞭解我國大學宿舍自治幹部暨同儕輔導員角色認同、角色實踐 與差異程度;比較不同背景變項之角色認同與實踐的差異情形,並歸納大學宿 舍自治幹部與同儕輔導員最主要服務內容為何;最後根據研究結果,提出相關 建議。 本研究以問卷調查為主,量表施測後再輔以開放性問卷調查,問卷主要分 為:角色認同與實踐、個人基本資料兩部分。研究樣本以我國八所公私立大學 的宿舍自治幹部暨宿舍同儕輔導員為對象,共發出586 份問卷,有效問卷計416份,選取16 位有意願的學生,進一步以開放性問卷調查。本研究主要發現如下: (一) 宿舍自治幹部與宿舍同儕輔導員的角色認同,介於「非常同意」與「同意」之間。平均得分最高為「促進交流互動及發揮同儕影響力」面向;最低為 「保障住宿生權利」面向。 (二) 宿舍自治幹部與宿舍同儕輔導員的角色實踐,介於「經常做到」與「偶爾做到」之間。平均得分最高為「促進交流互動及發揮同儕影響力」面向; 最低為「保障住宿生權利」面向。 (三) 宿舍自治幹部與宿舍同儕輔導員角色認同皆大於實踐程度。差異最大為 「提升宿舍教育功能」;最低為「協助處理宿舍行政事務」面向。 (四) 自變項中除了加入動機外,宿舍自治幹部與宿舍同儕輔導員角色認同與實踐均有顯著差異。 (五) 宿舍自治幹部認為最主要服務內容為「協助處理宿舍行政事務」;宿舍同儕輔導員認為最主要服務內容為「促進交流互動及發揮同儕影響力」。 本研究依研究發現,對學生、學校提出建議,以作為宿舍相關單位之參考。

並列摘要


This study was to understand the differences in role-identity and role-performance of the self-governance group and the peer consolers in the dormitory of the universities. The differences in role-identity and performance of different background and variables were compared and came up with the main services of the self-governance group and the peer consolers. Finally, proposed related advice according to the results. This research mainly used questionnaire survey, first tested with scales and then open questionnaire. It was divided into two parts: the role-identity and performance also personal information. The specimen was the self-governance group and the peer consolers in the dormitories from eight public or private universities. Total 586 questionnaires were given out and return with 416 effective ones. 16 willingly students were selected for further open questionnaire survey. The main findings of this research are: I. The role-identity of the self-governance group and the peer consolers of the dormitories were in between “very much agree” and “agree.” The aspect of “promoting interaction and peer influence” had the highest average point; the aspect of “secure the right of the dormitory residents” had the lowest points. II. The role performance of the self-governance group and the peer consolers of the dormitories were in between “often achieved” and “sometimes achieved.” The aspect of “promoting interaction and peer influence” had the highest average point; the aspect of “secure the right of the dormitory residents” had the lowest points. III. The role-identity of the self-governance group and the peer consolers of the dormitories was higher than the performance. “Promote the educational function of the dormitory” had the biggest differences; “assist with the dormitory administration affair” had the smallest differences. IV. For the independence variables, except join motivation, the role-identity and performance of the self-governance group and the peer consolers of the dormitories had prominent differences. V. The main service that the self-governance group thought was “assist with the dormitory administration affair;” the main service that the peer consolers thought was “promoting interaction and peer influence.” According to the results, this research proposes advice to the students and the school as the references for the dormitory-related sectors.

參考文獻


王淑芳(2004)。東吳大學學生宿舍同儕輔導制度實施成效之研究(未出版之
王潤身(2005)。從學生自治之角度探討學生宿舍自治組織之功能(未出版之
王介汶(2009)。大學學生宿舍內人際問題及處理方式研究(未出版之碩士論
江慧芬(2005)。從夾縫與探索中建構輔導工作:六所大專校院學生自治團體
杜慶進(2009)。公立高級中學秘書角色期望與角色踐行之研究—以臺北市為

被引用紀錄


蔡志賢(2012)。高等教育課外學習核心能力及其評量指標建構研究〔博士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315292274
謝育璐(2014)。學生宿舍硬體設施與管理制度對住宿生滿意度之影響-以中部某大學為例〔碩士論文,朝陽科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0078-2502201617132877

延伸閱讀