摘 要 本研究旨在分析不同學校性質、學校區位、性別及年級別之機械製圖科學生在空間能力測量與立體圖成就表現測驗之差異,並進一步探討兩者之相關性。 為達研究目的,以文獻分析、量表及測驗卷調查及專家座談與審查等方法進行研究。研究工具係修改自康鳳梅、鍾瑞國(87)所發展之「空間能力量表」及研究者自編之「立體圖成就表現測驗卷」。以我國高職機械製圖科學生為母群,採分層隨機及叢集取樣。有效「量表及測驗卷」共1523份。 所得資料以t考驗、單因子變異數分析、雪費事後比較、pearson積差相關等統計方法進行資料處理。分析歸納後提出下列結論: 一、不同學校性質、學校區位、性別及年級之學生在空間能力測量上的差異: (一)、公、私立學校學生在空間能力測量上的表現一致。 (二)、城市學校學生在空間能力測量上顯著高於鄉村學校學生。 (三)、男生在空間能力測量上顯著高於女生。 (四)、不同年級之學生在空間能力測量上的表現一致。 二、不同學校性質、學校區位、性別及年級之學生在立體圖成就表現測驗之差異: (一)、公立學校學生在立體圖成就表現測驗顯著高於私立學校學生。 (二)、城市學校學生在立體圖成就表現測驗上顯著高於鄉村學校學生。 (三)、男生在立體圖成就表現測驗上顯著高於女生。 (四)、不同年級之學生在立體圖成就表現測驗上三年級高於二年級、一年級,二年級高於一年級。 三、機械製圖科不同類別變項之學生在空間能力測量與立體圖成就表現測驗之相關: (一)、公立學校學生之空間能力測量與立體圖成就表現測驗有顯著相關。 (二)、私立學校學生之空間能力測量與立體圖成就表現測驗有顯著相關。 (三)、城市學校學生之空間能力測量與立體圖成就表現測驗有顯著相關。 (四)、鄉村學校學生之空間能力測量與立體圖成就表現測驗有顯著相關。 (五)、男生之空間能力測量與立體圖成就表現測驗有顯著相關。 (六)、女生之空間能力測量與立體圖成就表現測驗有顯著相關。 (七)、一年級學生之空間能力測量與立體圖成就表現測驗有顯著相關。 (八)、二年級學生之空間能力測量與立體圖成就表現測驗有顯著相關。 (九)、三年級學生之空間能力測量與立體圖成就表現測驗有顯著相關。 (十)、空間能力量表及各分量表測量對立體圖成就表現測驗及各分項測驗有顯著相關。 最後並根據研究結論,對教育行政單位、教學學單位、教師、及後續研究提出建議以供參考。 關鍵詞:空間能力、立體圖成就表現
Abstract The purposes of this research were: (1) to analyze the differences of test results between Spatial Ability Scale (SAS) and Pictorial Drawing Achievements Test (PDAT) that were administered on Mechanical Drawing (MD) students who were categorized into four variables, including their school types (public and private), school locations (urban and rural), genders (male and female), and grades (first, second, and third); and (2) to further explore the correlation of these two tests. In order to achieve the above goals, besides the aforementioned two tests, this study also took literature review and workshops as its research tools. The modified SAS was originally devised by Kun & chung (1998) and the PDAT was designed by the author. The population in this study includes all presently in-school students who major in MD, while the sampling approaches comprise a proportionate stratified random sampling and a cluster one. The valid SAS and PDAT returns, in sum, total 1523. Data amassed was processed by the statistical strategies of t-test, one-way ANOVA, Scheff’e posteriori comparison and product-moment correlation. The main conclusions are as follows: A. The differences of students’ spatial ability: A-1 There is no distinctive difference between public school students and private school ones in their spatial ability. A-2 Urban school students have significantly higher spatial ability than rural school ones. A-3 Male students’ spatial ability is significantly higher than female ones’. A-4 There is no distinctive difference in SAS takers among different grades. B. The differences of students’ PDAT: B-1 There is no apparent difference between public school students and private school ones. B-2 Urban school students have significantly higher PDAT scores than rural school ones. B-3 Male students’ achievement in PDAT is significantly higher than female ones. B-4 There are distinctive differences in PDAT takers among the first, second, and third graders: the third is higher than the second while the second is higher than the first. C. The correlation between the results of two tests in terms of relevant variables: C-1 There is a significant correlation between SAS and PDAT as to public school students. C-2 There is a significant correlation between SAS and PDAT as to private school students. C-3 There is a significant correlation between SAS and PDAT as to urban school students. C-4 There is a significant correlation between SAS and PDAT as to rural school students. C-5 There is a significant correlation between SAS and PDAT as to male MD students. C-6 There is a significant correlation between SAS and PDAT as to female MD students. C-7 There is a significant correlation between SAS and PDAT as to the MD freshmen. C-8 There is a significant correlation between SAS and PDAT as to the MD sophomores. C-9 There is a significant correlation between SAS and PDAT as to the MD seniors. C-10 There is also a distinct relationship between SAS and PDAT. According to the above conclusions, this study also summed up a few suggestions for educational agencies’, schoolteachers’, and further studies’ reference. Keywords: spatial ability , pictorial drawing Achievement