臺北市中小學體育育樂營實施現況及阻礙因素之研究

A Study of Implementary Status and Impedimentary Factors of Physical-Educational Amusement Camps of Taipei Elementary/Secondary Schools

巫慧萍

指導教授 ： 鄭志富

國立臺灣師範大學/運動與休閒學院/體育學系/碩士(2000年)

摘要

本研究旨在瞭解臺北市中小學體育育樂營實施現況與阻礙因素，並比較不同背景變項之體育育樂營承辦人員在阻礙因素的差異；研究對象為臺北市275所中小學校之體育育樂營承辦人員（包括高中職64所、國中61所、國小150所），並以「臺北市中小學體育育樂營實施現況調查問卷」為研究工具，計回收有效問卷215份。根據實際調查所蒐集之資料，分別以次數分配、次數百分比及one-way MANOVA等統計方法處理。研究結果如下：
一、 八十八學年度臺北市中小學體育育樂營實施現況
本研究發現舉辦體育育樂營之學校為99所，沒有舉辦的學校為116所；其中有舉辦的學校於活動結束後有召開檢討會之學校計70所，沒有召開的學校計29所。其次，舉辦體育育樂營的學校多為自行辦理，且以辦理一種營隊為優先考量；而營隊內容以單一性質為主，其運動項目比例最高為籃球，整體是以球類運動最受歡迎；在營隊舉辦時間方面則多舉辦於寒暑假期間，而活動時間以連續一週每日3∼4小時為多，且以使用學校場地進行活動的比例最高。再者，營隊參與對象以小學生為最多、參與人數為21-40人比例較高，且經費來源大多為學生自行負擔；而營隊教師及工作人員主要是由校內教職員工擔任，並使用校內（外）張貼宣傳海報及分發宣傳單等方式宣傳。
二、 臺北市中小學校舉辦體育育樂營阻礙因素
1.臺北市中小學校舉辦體育育樂營的阻礙因素以『個人認知』最高，『活動資源』最低。
2.不同層級學校、不同個人承辦經驗、及學校過去舉辦經驗與否之體育育樂營承辦人員，於各構面阻礙因素差異比較達顯著差異；不同職別及性別之體育育樂營承辦人員，於各構面阻礙因素差異比較則未達顯著差異。
關鍵字︰體育育樂營、阻礙因素

關鍵字

體育育樂營 ； 阻礙因素

並列摘要

The purposes of this study were to understand the implementary status and impedimentary factors of physical-educational amusement camps of Taipei elementary/secondary schools and compare the differences in the factors, which impede the undertakers of physical-educational amusement camps with different background variables. The studying subjects were the undertakers of the physical-educational amusement camps in Taipei’s 275 elementary/secondary schools (including 64 senior high/vocational schools, 61 junior high schools and 150 elementary schools) and the studying tools were “Questionnaire of Implementary Status of Physical-Educational Amusement Camps of Taipei Elementary/Secondary Schools”, and reclaimed 215 valid questionnaires. The data collected from practical investigation were handled by the statistical methods of frequency, percentage and one-way MANOVA, etc. The studying results were as follows:
I. The implementary status of 1999’s physical-educational amusement camps of Taipei elementary/secondary schools
There were 99 schools that held physical-educational amusement camps and 116 schools hadn’t held. In the 99 schools, there were 70 schools that held review meetings and 29 schools hadn’t held review meetings. The most camps were held by schools and one camp was the first choice. Ball games took the largest proportion in camp sports items, and basketball was the highest. The time of camps was mostly held in summer or winter vacations. For the activity time of camps, continuous and 3~4 hours every day took the largest proportion. Schools were most frequently used for the place of camps. The participants of camps mostly were elementary school students, and the group with maximum camp participants were 21-40 members. The source of camp expense, most were paid by students. For the source of camp teachers and stuffs, most were the teachers in their own schools. For promotion, most were by posting posters and distributing promotion material inside and outside of schools.
II. Impedimentary Factors of Holding Physical-Educational Amusement Camps for Taipei Elementary/Secondary Schools
1. The highest impedimentary factor of holding physical-educational amusement camps for Taipei elementary/secondary schools was “personal recognition” and the lowest was “activity resources”.
2. Different-level schools, different undertaker’s personal experience and school’s experience in holding such physical-educational amusement camp were more evident impedimentary factors, while different positions and genders of the undertakers of physical-educational amusement camps were less evident impedimentary factors.

參考文獻

王泠、王瑞麟、李麗瓊（民88）︰運動休閒育樂營的行銷概念探討，國民體育季刊，42，149-157。

王傳銘（民85）：Recreation與Leisure的含義，戶外遊憩研究，9（1），107-114。

洪嘉文（民89）：學校體育育樂營展現況與未來展望，國民體育季刊，29（3），6-13。

黃德祥（民83）：青少年發展與輔導，台北：五南圖書出版公司。

許義雄（民69）：休閒的意義、內容及其方法，體育學報，2，27-40。