本研究目的在於探討衛生教育介入後,對都市原住民之菸害認知、拒菸自我效能、吸菸量改變情形及飲酒知識、拒酒自我效能、飲酒量改變情之影響效果。本研究設計採準實驗設計之「不等的前測-後測控制組設計」,立意取樣樹林地區之A、B兩個教會共125位都市原住民為研究對象,分別為實驗組及對照組。在衛生教育介入前,二組皆接受前測,作為學習評量的比較基礎,實驗組接受四週有關吸菸、飲酒防制教學,對照組不接受任何實驗處理,衛生教育介入後立即進行後測,以了解實驗介入後所產生的立即影響效果,衛生教育結束四週後實施後後測追蹤其延宕效果。資料以卡方考驗、t考驗、單因子共變數分析、重複量數單因子共變數分析、百分率等統計方法進行分析,所得結果如下: 一、 菸害知識得分方面,衛生教育介入後一週,及四週後,實驗組的菸害認知後測及後後測均未達顯著差異,顯示衛生教育介入對增進「菸害認知」之立即影響效果及延宕影響效果不顯著。 二、 拒菸自我效能之影響效果方面,不論在衛生教育介入後一週,及四週後,實驗組的拒菸自我效能後測及後後測均達顯著差異,顯示衛生教育介入對增進「拒菸自我效能」效果顯著。 三、 吸菸行為之影響效果方面,不論在衛生教育介入後一週,及四週後,實驗組吸菸行為之後測及後後測得分均顯著低於對照組,顯示衛生教育介入對改善「吸菸量改變情形」效果顯著。 四、 飲酒知識得分方面,衛生教育介入後一週,及四週後,實驗組的飲酒知識後測及後後測均未達顯著差異,顯示衛生教育介入對增進「飲酒知識」之立即影響效果及延宕影響效果不顯著。 五、 拒酒自我效能之影響效果方面,不論在衛生教育介入後一週,及四週後,實驗組的拒酒自我效能後測及後後測均達顯著差異,顯示衛生教育介入對增進「拒酒自我效能」效果顯著。 六、 飲酒行為之影響效果方面,在衛生教育介入後一週,實驗組的飲酒行為之後測得分顯著高於對照組,亦即實驗組吸菸量大於對照組,顯示衛生教育介入對改善「飲酒行為」立即影響效果不顯著。在衛生教育介入後四週,實驗組的飲酒行為之後後測得分顯著低於對照組,顯示衛生教育介入對改善「飲酒行為」延宕影響效果顯著。 七、 各單元教學活動之評價方面,整體而言,接受四次衛生教育介入之研究對象,至少有70%以上很喜歡各教學單元; 80%以上之研究對象認為各教學單元很有幫助。 根據研究結果,可作為都市原住民吸菸、飲酒行為防制教學的參考,用以增加拒菸自我效能、拒酒自我效能,繼而能減少吸菸行為及飲酒行為。
The purpose of this study was to explore the effect of health education intervention in the cognition of smoking hazard, self-efficacy of antismoking, the change of smoking amount, the cognition of drinking, self-efficacy of anti-drinking, and the change of drinking amount for urban aboriginal. A non-equivalent control groups design was conducted. Purposeful sampling was employed from two local churches in Shu Lin area. A total of 125 aboriginal subjects were recruited, and divided to experimental and control groups. Both experimental and control groups took pre-test in order to set baseline, and only the experimental group obtained 4-weeks classes regarding to the prevention of smoking and drinking. The experimental group took post-test immediately after intervention in order to evaluate the instant effect of teaching programs. The fellow-up (post posttest) evaluation in the next fourth weeks. Data was analyzed by using descriptive statistics, χ2-test, t-test, ANCOVA, and repeat measure ANCOVA. The results showed as following:(1)the knowledge in smoking hazard part, there is no difference between post and post post-tests in experimental group after the first and fourth week health education intervention(2)in the effect of self-efficacy of antismoking aspect, there is a significant difference between post and post-post tests after the first and fourth week intervention; (3)smoking behavior had been significantly improved after the first and fourth week health education intervention;(4)in experimental group, there is no difference between post and post-post tests after the first and fourth week intervention in the knowledge of drinking;(5)in experimental group, there is a significant difference between post and post-post tests after the first and fourth week intervention in the self-efficacy of drinking;(6)the drinking behavior had not been improved after the first week intervention in the experimental group, however the drinking behvior had obviously decreased after the fourth week intervention;(7)in the whole, at least 70% of subjects stated they liked each learning activity, and more than 80 %subjects admitted those learning activities were helpful. The findings of this study can provide information regarding the prevention of smoking and drinking behaviors in order to increase the self-efficacy of antismoking as well as anti-drinking, and to decrease the smoking and drinking behaviors.