校外教學最有利標評選項目重要性之研究—以臺北市國民中學訓育組長觀點為例

The Research of the Importance of Public Appraisal Elements in the Most Advantageous Tender of School Field Trips—From the Perspective of the Section Chief of Student Activities As an Example

林建宏(Chien-hung Lin)

指導教授 ： 李晶

國立臺灣師範大學/運動與休閒學院/運動與休閒管理研究所在職碩士班/碩士(2007年)

摘要

本研究之目的在建構評選承辦臺北市國民中學不同類型校外教學活動廠商的評選項目與其重要性。本研究以深度訪談法，採用半結構的訪談大綱，針對臺北市8所不同規模之國民中學，探討訓育組長辦理校外教學活動，採用最有利標決標方式評選承辦廠商的情形；依評選項目中的「功能」、「技術」、「品質」、「管理」、「商業條款」、「價格」、「過去履約績效」七個面向進行分析，將訪談資料整理歸納後，進行事後評估，以了解各校辦理不同類型校外教學的評選項目與其重要性。
本研究研究結論如下：1.學科領域校外教學（1日校外教學）評選項目首重「價格」：因為1日的校外教學活動在規劃上較為容易，且無過於複雜的住宿、膳食問題，因此，大部分學校主要會先從廠商所提供活動企劃中的「價格」作為優先考量。2.定期校外教學活動（小型教育旅行活動）評選項目首重「技術」：現行的定期校外教學活動是以童軍的隔宿露營方式辦理，因此，除了廠商須提供完善的活動規劃之外，活動執行的康輔人員也必須具備活動相關的專業技能、團康帶領技巧。3.教育旅行活動評選項目首重「品質」：辦理3天2夜的畢業旅行活動，住宿飯店的安全性與房間分布的集中性、膳食安排的衛生程度與營養均衡、交通車輛與司機素質的嚴格把關等問題，皆須嚴縝規劃。
針對後續研究，建議以量化的方式擴大採樣範圍，增加受訪之樣本，獲得較完整之資料，則可對校外教學的評選工作有更深的了解。

關鍵字

校外教學 ； 最有利標 ； 評選項目

並列摘要

The main purpose of this research was to construct the importance of selection criteria of agencies responsible for different field trips in junior high schools in Taipei. This research adopted in-depth interview, using semi-constructed interviewing conspectus, focusing on eight different scales of junior high schools in Taipei, probing into the adoption of the most advantageous tender in selecting undertaking agencies during the process of conducting field trips by student activity section chiefs; analyzing in accordance to the seven phases of selection criteria: “function”, “technology”, “quality”, “management”, “commercial terms”, “price” and “past achievements in contract performance”, coordinating and inducing interview documentations, processing post evaluation, to finally understand the selection criteria and their importance of different schools conducting different kinds of field trips.
The research concluded as follows: 1. curriculum-related field trips (one day field trips), the most significant area in terms of selecting was “price”: it was because it’s quite simple to formulate, without complicated matters relating to lodging and boarding, therefore, most schools will take in the “price” in the activity proposal provided by agencies into prior consideration. 2. field trips on a regular basis (small scale educational activity), the most the most significant area in terms of selecting was “technique”: the current field trips on a regular basis were conducted as overnight camporees, so therefore, besides the perfectibility of the activity scheme the agencies were required to provide, the executive instructors need to possess professional skills that were related to the activity. 3. long term field trips, the most significant area in terms of selecting was “quality”, conducting a 3-day-2-night graduation trip, the security of the lodging hotel and its room concentrations, the arrangement of boarding and its sanitation and nutrition balance, transporting vehicles and driver quality that needs to be strictly checked upon, these matters were all needed to be worked out with great caution.
Aiming at follow-up researches, it was suggested to apply quantification to expand sampling range, to increase interview patterns, to obtain more complete information, in order to comprehend and gain a better picture of the selection assignment of extra-curriculum educational activities.

並列關鍵字

school field trips ； the most advantageous tender ； selection criteria

參考文獻

李晶（2001）。國小教師對休閒農場提供資源實施校外教學活動之評估研究。臺北師大學報，46（1），93-110。

周孟志（2003）戶外教學在社會學習領域的實務應用。教師之友，44（4），35-44。

范麗娟（1994）。深度訪談簡介。戶外遊憩研究，7（2），25-35。

陳信譚﹙2007﹚。校外教學採購最有利標評選項目及權重建構之研究。未出版碩士論文，國立暨南國際大學，南投縣。

蔡居澤（1996）。戶外教育的涵義及其發展之探討。公民訓育學報，5，283-302。