透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.188.29.128
  • 學位論文

基於專利地圖與能力集合擴展之開放性創新策略

Open innovation strategy based on the patent map and competence set expansion

指導教授 : 洪翊軒
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


專利地圖(Patent Map)乃透過專利的檢索技巧,檢索出與研究主題相關之專利資料,並以統計分析之方法,加以整理製成可分析、解讀、或以圖表格式呈現之加值化專利資訊,即可獲取包含在其內的豐富專利資訊內涵。能力集合擴展(Competence Set Expansion)為在一個產品開發專案中,決定所需技術的開發優先順序與其中扮演著重要的角色。若以能力集合擴展而言,則可視為一產品開發專案為達成某一決策問題之期望目標所需之能力集合。借由透過此能力集合擴展分析,得到產品開發創新之策略,來加快創新流程及提升創新績效鞏固並維持其競爭優勢。因此,本研究首先針對擬分析的技術進行專利檢索,並依據檢索結果建構專利地圖後,盤點組織之技術現況以及與主要競爭者與未來發展趨勢之落差後,選擇未來計畫擴充的能力,進行能力集合擴展,並針對擬擴充之能力,訂定適合之開放式創新策略。(1)基於專利搜索結果繪製專利地圖 (2)能力的選擇於標準和評估和選擇的能力選擇; (3)優先考慮的能力:DEMATEL的標準和DNP權重與定義之間的關係;(4)建議開放式創新戰略; (5)優先的開放式創新戰略。 運用專利地圖分析加上能力集合擴展概念的方法,找出產品在開發時的優先順序,從而解決專案在產品開發中所需面臨的決策問題,來說明所提出方法的可行性及有用性。

並列摘要


The patent mapping is a patent analysis method which derives patent functionality and technology related statistical information and demonstrate such information in a matrix. Competence set expansion technique can serve a very dominant role in new product development. Technology or resource can be developed and further, Therefore, this study aims to define an analytic framework to derive the technology trend or competitive information at first based on a patent map being derived based on patent search results. Then, the gaps between the state of the art of the technology versus the aspired level as well as the factors for evaluation the technologies, In general, the research process can be summarized as follows: (1) patent map construction based on patent search results, (2) derivation of the current level of the patent versus the aspired level, (3) criteria definitions for competence prioritization, (4) derivations of influence relationships between criteria by using the Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL), (5) derivations of weights versus each criteria by using the DEMATEL based network process (DN)), The well-verified analytic framework can use for competence set expansions and corresponding open innovation strategy definitions.

參考文獻


Afuah, A. (1998). Models of innovation. Innovation Management New York: Oxford University Press.
Ashton, W. B., & Sen, R. K. (1988). Using patent information in technology business planning-I. Research technology management, 31(6), 42.
Baker, W. E., & Sinkula, J. M. (2005). Market orientation and the new product paradox. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22(6), 483-502.
Bastic, M. (2004). Success factors in transition countries. European Journal of Innovation Management, 7(1), 65-79.
Bogers, M. (2011). The open innovation paradox: knowledge sharing and protection in R&D collaborations. European Journal of Innovation Management, 14(1), 93-117.

延伸閱讀