透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.220.11.34
  • 學位論文

國民中學教師創造力與創新教學行為量表編製及相關因素之研究

A Study on Developing a Scale to Measure Creativity and Innovation in Instructional Behavior of Junior High School Teachers and the Related Factors in COCO Model

指導教授 : 潘裕豐
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


本研究旨在根據Donald J. Treffinger的COCO模式建構一份適合國民中學教師使用之創造力與創新教學行為量表,以臺北市、新北市、桃園市國民中學教師為研究對象,探討不同背景變項之教師在創造力與創新教學行為上的情形,並檢驗其差異。研究工具為研究者自行編製之「國民中學教師創造力與創新教學行為量表」,量表經預試後修訂成正式量表,針對567名國中教師施測,資料回收後,採用描述統計呈現各項統計數據,如平均數、標準差等;以探索性因素分析、效標關聯效度建立量表的建構效度;以重測信度、內部一致性信度確認量表之穩定度;以獨立樣本t檢定分析男、女教師之差異;以單因子獨立樣本ANOVA分析不同年齡、年資、任教領域教師之差異。結果發現:(一)研究者自編之量表含有「特質」、「運作」、「情境」、「成果」四個構面,信效度分析後,確認具有良好之信、效度,可以評量國民中學教師之創造力與創新教學行為;(二)不同性別、不同任教領域的國民中學教師在創造力與創新教學行為上無差異;(三)不同年齡、不同任教年資的國民中學教師在創造力與創新教學行為上有差異。最後,根據研究結果提出建議,並對未來之後續研究擬出建議,俾供參考。

並列摘要


Based on COCO model introduced by Donald J. Treffinger, the study aimed to make a creativity and innovative teaching scale for junior high school teachers in Taipei City, New Taipei City and Taoyuan City to explore the creativity and innovative teaching behavior among the teachers with different background variables and examine their differences among the teachers. The research tool is “Creativity and Innovation Scale for Junior High School Teachers” designed by researcher. The scale was revised after trial and used officially for testing 567 junior high school teachers. After collecting the data, descriptive statistics was used to present various statistics , such as average, standard deviation; exploratory factor analysis and criterion-related validity were used to build up the construct validity of the scale; test-retest reliability and internal consistency reliability were used to confirm the stability of the scale; independent sample T test was used to analyze the differences between male and female teachers; one-way ANOVA was used to analyze the age, seniority and subject differences in teachers. The result revealed that first, the scale designed by the researcher includes the four perspectives of “characteristics”, “operations”, ”context” and “outcomes”. It is confirmed that the scale is with good reliability and validity after reliability and validity analysis, and is able to evaluate creativity and innovative teaching behavior of the junior high school teachers. Second, there is no difference in the creativity and innovative teaching behavior among teachers with different gender and subject. Third, there are differences in the creativity and innovative teaching behavior among teachers with different age and seniority. Finally, suggestions were made according to the research result, and advice on the follow-up studies was provided for future reference.

參考文獻


林生傳、黃誌坤、林達森(2007)。知識經濟社會取向的創新教學之實驗研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系教育學刊,28,101-135。
陳姿羽、潘裕豐(2012)。高職藝術與設計群學生人格特質與創造力關係之研究:以復興商工為例。創造學刊,3(1),19-52。
蕭顯勝、伍建學(2003)。創造思考教學策略融入網路遊戲教學模式之建立。生活科技教育月刊,36(2),38-52。
一、中文部分
毛連塭、郭有遹、陳龍安、林幸台(2000)。創造力研究。臺北市:心理。

延伸閱讀