透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.20.221.178
  • 學位論文

主觀知識和客觀知識如何影響判斷修正量

How should Subjective Knowledge and Objective Knowledge Influence the Amount of Judgmental Correction

指導教授 : 蕭中強
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

並列摘要


The Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) has been introduced in marketing researches for describing advertising persuasion since the 1980s. ELM defined that there are variables that resolve people’s emotion and have the effect on his or her evaluation. This study will apply the flexible correction to examine how the contrast degrees between subjective knowledge and objective knowledge affect attitude confidence and judgmental correction. In the present research, we define high involvement in all our participants and manipulate participants into two major groups. Half of the participants will be served as high subjective knowledge with low objective knowledge, and the remaining participants will be served as low subjective knowledge with high objective knowledge. The participants in this experiment are Thai people, and we collected the data from an online survey. The results of these analyses showed that participants with low subjective knowledge have more correction on attractive endorser than participants with high subjective knowledge. The attractive endorser has more effect when participants are served as a high subjective knowledge. Key words: elaboration likelihood Model, flexible correction model, bias correction, subjective knowledge, objective knowledge, judgmental attitude, evaluation.

參考文獻


Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117-140. doi: 10.1177/001872675400700202
REFERENCE
Alba, J., & Hutchinson, J. (1987). Dimensions of consumer expertise. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(4), 411. doi: 10.1086/209080
Alba, J., & Hutchinson, J. (2000). Knowledge calibration: What consumers know and what they think they know. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(2), 123-156. doi: 10.1086/314317
Bearden, W., Hardesty, D., & Rose, R. (2001). Consumer self-confidence: Refinements in conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1), 121-134. doi: 10.1086/321951

延伸閱讀