透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.222.117.109
  • 學位論文

繪本創造思考教學對國小學童視覺藝術表現及創造力之影響

The Effects of Creative Thinking Instruction on Student's Viaual Art Performance for 2nd graders

指導教授 : 潘裕豐
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


本研究旨在探究國小低年級學童透過繪本創造力思考教學融入生活美勞之視覺藝術課程後,在創造力及視覺藝術上的學習成效。研究對象為新北市某國小二年級兩個班級共43位學生。本研究為教學實驗,採「不等組前後測準實驗」,受試的兩個班級分別為實驗組實施「創思繪本視覺藝術教案」、對照組實施「一般傳統講述法」教學,課程進行8週16節課。研究工具使用「新編創造力測驗」、視覺藝術表現作品評分表、學生學習滿意度調查表等,蒐集量化數據後以單因子共變數分析、獨立樣本t考驗等之量化數據進行分析與驗證假設,另整理學生作品、學習回饋等質性資料輔助結果分析。研究結果顯示在創造力表現上,兩組學生測驗結果在流暢力表現上達邊緣顯著,變通力、獨創力、精進力則未達統計上之顯著差異;在視覺藝術表現上,部分分向在統計數據上達顯著差異。雖統計數據未達預期之顯著差異成效,但從平均分數與學生學習滿意度調查表的回饋來看,可發現此教學設計的實施對於創造力與視覺藝術表現上仍有一定成效。研究者根據研究結果提出教學上之建議與提供相關領域研究者或教師未來研究時的方向。

並列摘要


The aim of this study was to investigate the learning outcomes of creativity and visual arts for lower-grade elementary school students through the integration of picture book-based creative thinking teaching into life art courses. The research subjects were 43 second-grade students from two classes in a primary school in New Taipei City. This study was an experimental teaching approach using a "nonequivalent control group pretest-posttest design." The experimental group was taught with "creative picture book visual art teaching materials," while the control group was taught with "traditional lecture-based teaching methods." The course was conducted for 8 weeks with 16 sessions. The research tools used included the "New Test of Creative Thinking," the "Visual Art Performance Evaluation Form," and a "Student Learning Satisfaction Survey," among others. Quantitative data were collected and analyzed using one-way ANCOVA and independent samples t-test to verify hypotheses. Qualitative data, such as student work and feedback, were also analyzed. The results showed marginal significance in fluency performance in creativity tests for both groups of students, with no statistically significant difference in adaptability, creativity, and proficiency. Regarding visual art performance, some sub-scores showed significant differences in statistical data. Although the statistical data did not show the expected significant differences, it was found that this teaching design had certain effects on creativity and visual art performance based on the average scores and student learning satisfaction feedback. The researchers made suggestions for teaching and provided future research directions for relevant researchers or teachers based on the results.

參考文獻


Buzan,T. (1997)。心智繪圖~思想整合利器(羅玲妃譯)。一智企業。
Kaufman, J. C. & Sternberf, R. J. (2014)。創造力與當代議題面面觀(黃曉嵐、蔡淑君、湖翠茵、張芝萱譯)。華藤文化。
Lowenfeld, V., & Brittain, W. L. (1975)。創性與心智的成長(Creative and Mental Growth) (王德育譯)。啟源。
Runco, M. A. (2008)。創造力當代理論與議題(邱皓政、丁興祥、林耀南、陳育瑜、林碧芳、王詩婷、賴靜儀、柯怡安、陳佳筠、何潤娥譯)。心理。
Wood, C. (2004)。兒童發展指標(林合懋譯)。遠流。(原著出版年1997)

延伸閱讀