本論文研究之目的在於針對專利法上實驗使用免責規定之法理發展,以其法理起源之美國判決發展為主要研究對象,希望提供此議題之研究更全面完整的資料。 本文內容以美國實務判決見解為主,除判決結果外,尚力求案件事實之說明,以求適用法律之妥適,並輔以相關學說之見解與批評,說明實務運作上可能之不足與缺失。 再由學說所指述之內容延伸說明相關國際與其他國家之相關規定與實 務運作,對照當今美國實務發展,從另一角度闡述此法理的運作情形。 最後再由前述國外的規定與實務,說明我國目前法規與實務現況之弊病,並由修法之方向與其他外國規定之相符說明此法理未來在運用上的目標與作用。 結論除再次肯定實驗使用之必要外,也對於其內容未來之發展提供建議。
The purpose of this dissertation is providing more comprehensive and complete data of this issue, it aims on the development of this legal principle, especially mainly focus on its source, the U.S. judicial development. The content of this dissertation is mainly based on the U.S. practical judgments views, beside the judicial results, it also pays more attention on the fact issues to fit the application of law properly. After that, we arrange some theories about this issue to clarify the possible short and missing of practical operation. From the content, we see some different regulation and views from the other countries, so we discuss them to compare with the U.S. practical development by other points of view. Finally, we point the present shortcoming of our country by the former foreign regulation and practical operation, and we explain the consistency between the amending of the law and the foreign law. We affirm the merits of experimental use exception again, and make some conclusions and suggestion.