透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.191.171.235
  • 學位論文

高中與高職學生校園暴行被害經驗之比較研究

Victimization of Senior High School and Vocational High School Students

指導教授 : 周愫嫻教授
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


本研究以立意取樣方法抽取新竹縣高中、高職與綜合高中二、三年級共計552位學生為樣本, 研究方法採自陳問卷調查法。本研究之探討如下:第一是探討高中職校園暴行被害的現況及被害經驗,第二是探討校園暴行被害因素。研究主要發現為: 一、 發生率最高者為遭言詞羞辱、推擠、猥褻動作。 二、 最常見之發生地點為教室,並有同學在場。 三、 被害後學生多數不求助,而求助首要對象是同儕。 四、 男性、高職、母親從事高級專業職業、師生、同儕關係不佳、體型高壯、上學期智育表現較不理想、上學時間較常穿戴名牌之學生容易成為校園暴行之被害人。 據此,本研究建議: 一、 家庭因素對校園暴行被害影響薄弱,可研議將家庭因素排除在學校預防工作之外。 二、 教育工作者與輔導工作者應透過師生關係與同儕關係來辨識被害的高危險群。 三、 高職應更積極主動營造一個安全的學習環境。

關鍵字

校園暴行 被害

並列摘要


By using an administered questionnaire, the study comprised a purposive sample of 552 senior high school and vocational high school students from grades 2 and 3 in Hsin-Chu County. The study had two aims:(1)to understand campus violence victimization of senior high school and vocational high school students; and (2)to analyze important factors to predict campus victimization. The study found that (1) being physically pushed around and making indecent gestures are the most popular forms of campus violence among students; (2) campus violence is most likely to happen in classrooms when schoolmates are present at the scene; (3) most campus violence victims don’t seek help. Victims would tell friends if help is needed; (4) male, tall and strong, vocational school students, mothers working in professional jobs, poor teacher-student students relationships, poor academic achievement and wearing designer’ products to school are the most significant predictors of victimization on campus. Three suggestions are made to prevent the victimization of high school students. First, schools might consider ruling out the family-related factors since they are least important to victimization on campus violence. Second, teachers should provide more assistance to potential victims via encouraging better interpersonal relationships, especially with teachers and classmates. Finally, vocational high schools need to make more efforts to construct a safer learning environment for their students.

並列關鍵字

campus victim victimization

參考文獻


1995〈校園安全的殺手:校園暴力的深度探討〉。《師友月刊》337:41-46。
2002《教育政策分析─理論與實務》。台北:五南圖書。
1995〈從被害者學觀點探索校園暴行、被害經驗、加害行為與被害恐懼感之關係〉。《犯罪學期刊》1:77-122。
2000〈暴力犯罪少年家庭特徵與家庭生活體驗〉。《犯罪學期刊》5:49-78。
台灣教育長期追蹤資料庫電子報

被引用紀錄


陳婕誼(2014)。少年生活中的風險與生活福祉之相關研究─以屏東縣為例〔碩士論文,國立屏東科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6346/NPUST.2014.00058
顏秀娟(2012)。新竹地區高中職學生校園霸凌之受凌經驗及其相關因素研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315275551
呂敏綺(2016)。高中職霸凌受害學生個人特質及相關因素之研究 -以嘉義市高中職生為例〔碩士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201614063877

延伸閱讀