跨境共同打擊新興電信詐欺與兩岸刑事司法互助之研究

Cross-Border Fighting The Newly Emerging Crime of Telecommunication Fraud and Cross-Strait Judicial Mutual Assistance

陳敏雄(Min-Hsiung Chen)

指導教授 ： 蔡育岱

國立中正大學/社會科學院/戰略暨國際事務研究所/碩士(2014年)

摘要

隨著兩岸關係密切發展，經貿頻繁交流下，加上電信及金融業自由化所帶來的便利，涉及跨境之犯罪問題逐漸顯現，特別是運用電話、手機、網路等通訊設備及網銀金融轉帳等方式，進行詐欺取財案件屢有所聞，有別於以往傳統詐騙手法，新興電信詐欺大肆橫行於兩岸，並向東南亞地區漫延，成為不同領域的共同犯罪問題，其犯罪手法不斷演進翻新，巧藉各種名目詐騙民眾獲取不法暴利，嚴重影響社會治安，且破壞人與人相處之基本信任，所衍生之治安、司法及主權問題，成為非傳統之國家安全議題。
本研究以國際間之刑事司法互助原則，探討兩岸從以引渡偷渡客為主之「金門協議」，至兼具打擊犯罪與刑事司法互助性質之「海峽兩岸共同打擊犯罪及司法互助協議」所產生成效，並就雙方司法單位所面對機動化、專業化及組織分工化之犯罪集團，在司法、資訊、電信等方面之偵辦重點，並以跨境共同打擊電信詐欺之實際案例，參酌司法院判決，分析現行兩岸共同打擊犯罪機制，提出問題困境及建議，期能提供學術及決策者討論與參考。

關鍵字

海峽兩岸共同打擊犯罪及司法互助協議 ； 刑事司法互助 ； 新興電信詐欺 ； 跨境犯罪

並列摘要

With the development of cross-strait relationship, the economic and trade exchanges become frequently. Cross-border crimes have emerged, special in the convenience of electronic communication and financial liberalization. In such situation, Newly Emerging Crime of Telecommunication Fraud has been pervasive and differently comparing former type. The method of committing fraud crime incessant changing its form and spread not only in Taiwan but also to Mainland China and Southeast Asia. It is not a problem of single area. In order to cheating people, their causes are so real and vivid, that spoils each other’s trust and damages social security. The issue involved social security、jurisdiction and sovereignty has become an Non-traditional security agenda.
Accounting to international rules on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters, this research will discuss from “Kinmen Agreement” to “The Cross-Strait Joint Crime-Fighting and Judicial Mutual Assistance Agreement”, including illegal immigration repatriation, investigation cooperation and judicial assistance in criminal matters. We still want to research the technics in judicature、internet information and telecommunication, when each side of investigation office face the criminal groups which are more clever、professional and organizational than ever. In this paper, the result of sentences are applying in several cross-strait crime-fighting, we found there are still some obstacles need to be resolved. In order to strengthen the mechanism of crime-fighting between Taiwan and Mainland China, this study offers scholars and decision makers some reviewing and resolution advises. Hope it will good for further discussions and consultation.

並列關鍵字

The Cross-Strait Joint Crime-Fighting and Judicial Mutual Assistance Agreement ； Judicial Mutual Assistance ； Cross-border Crime ； Newly Emerging Crime of Telecommunication Fraud

參考文獻

李傑清，洗錢防制的課題與展望（台北：法務部調查局，2006年）。

吳景芳，「國際刑事司法互助基本原則之探討」，台大法學論叢，第23卷第2期（1994年），頁331-348。

丁復水，「新興詐欺犯罪問題防治法制之研究」，國立中山大學大陸研究所碩士碩文，2005年。

蔡育岱、譚偉恩，「從『國家』到『個人』人類安全概念之分析」，問題與研究，第47卷第1期（2008年），頁151-188。

邱鼎文，「論經由司法互助取得證據之證據能力—以傳聞法則與排除法則為中心」，東海大學法律學院法律學研究所碩士論文，2012年。