本研究目的主要探討「探索教育課程融入高中職校外教學對生活效能及團隊凝聚力的影響」,並根據研究結果提供給學校實施校外教學的建議。本研究採用準實驗設計,藉由前後測設計探討探索教育、體驗式探索教育及一般校外教學課程對學生校外教學生活效能及團隊凝聚力成效之影響。本研究分成實驗組實施探索教育課程,對照組一實施體驗式探索教育課程,對照組二實施一般校外教學課程並採用冒險教育「生活效能」量表(含時間管理、情緒控制、成就動機、社交領導、自信心與主動積極性等6個面向)與「團隊凝聚力」量表進行成效分析。以套裝軟體 SPSS 18.0 for Windows 將施測問卷進行資料處理,以前測與後測差異,進行描述性統計、相依樣本t檢定、單因子變異數分析與效果值(effect size,簡稱ES)檢驗,探討實驗組、對照組一及對照組二是否能增進高中職校外教學在生活效能與團隊凝聚力之效益,實驗結果為實驗組與對照組一的生活效能及團隊凝聚力在前後測有顯著差異,對照組二的生活效能沒有顯著差異但對團隊凝聚力有顯著差異。另本次研究在生活效能及團隊凝聚力的影響中對照組一優於實驗組;實驗組優於對照組二。
The main purpose of the research is to discuss the effects of adventure education integrated field trip on senior high and vocational school students' life effectiveness and group cohesion. According to the research results, we provide schools with the suggestion of carrying out the field trip. The quasi-experiment design was used in this. We discuss and devise the effects of the adventure education, experiencing adventure education and normal field trip program on the students’ life-effectiveness and group cohesion by pretest and posttest . This research divided the students into three groups. The experimental group proceeds with the adventure education program. The control group NO.1 proceeds with the experiencing adventure education program. The control group NO.2 proceeds with the normal field trip program. We adopt the adventure education life- effectiveness scale (including time management,emotional control, achievement motivation , social competence, self confidence, and active initiative) and group cohesion scale to evaluate the performance. The software SPSS 18.0 for Windows was used to process the questionnaire. Also, the methods of paired-sample t test, One-way ANOVA and effect size were taken to discuss whether those field trip test group could promote the effect of on the students’ life-effectiveness and group cohesion by pretest and posttest. The result showed that, by pretest and posttest, the life-effectiveness and group cohesion both had significantly differences on the experiment group and the control group No.1. The life-effectiveness had no significantly differece on the control group No.2 while the group cohesion had. Furthermore, this research showed that the control group No.1 scored better than the experiment group on the effect of the students’ life-effectiveness and group cohesion while the experiment group scored better than the control group No.2.