透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.118.193.232
  • 學位論文

應用專利分析探討我國木製家具技術發展

Using patent analysis to investigate the technology development of wooden furniture manufacturing in Taiwan

指導教授 : 李祥林

摘要


本研究利用專利分析研究木製家具產業相關技術,探討本產業的近況與技術發展趨勢。本研究藉由檢索中華民國智慧財產局專利資料庫 2019 年 12 月 31 日前之專利,獲得符合本研究範圍之專利為 835 件。 本研究透過歷年趨勢分析、專利權人分析、IPC分析、技術功效矩陣探討現有木製家具技術的發展,結果發現本產業並無明企業佔有顯技術優勢,各主要公司的技術均以單一種類家具或領域為主要發展重點。 本研究將家具分為桌、椅、床、儲藏類家具分別討論,各類別家具主要使用技術大致相同,為了提升拆裝效率多採用嵌合結構用以家具組合。各類家具間的技術有些許共通性,具有同樣特徵或構造的家具會採用相近的技術。部分家具擁有明顯的專用技術,例如椅類的本體結構或儲藏類的零件,這些異同之處可作為廠商跨足多領域的利基或參考。 分析近十年(2010-2019)的專利發現,家具的功效訴求有些變化。過去家具功能或功效訴求在近十年有消長情形,建議廠商密切注意市場上的變化,針對不同家具的功效需求發展技術,並作為未來廠商發展之參考依據。

並列摘要


This research uses patent analysis to investigate the technology development in wood furniture industry in Taiwan. The applcations of patents submitted before Dec. 31, 2019 are surveyed and collected from the database of the Intellectual Office of Republic of China. 835 related patents are identified. The results show that the foreign companies only applied a small amount of patents with large percentage of invention patents. On the other hand, the domestic assignees focus of new model patents instead of the invention patents. The patents identified are classified into 4 furniture groups, namely, tables, chairs, closets, beds. It is found that the technologies applied in each furniture groups are similar to each other, with an exception that the closet group uses more hardware components or assemblies to achieve various storage purposes. From the functionality and performance perspectives of the furniture, this research concludes that the development of new technologies is the increase the efficiency of manufacturing or usage of the furniture, or the life of the furniture. By looking at the patents of the past 10 years, it is clear that, due to the change of the furniture functionalities, the focuses of the technology development are also shifted. Finally, the recommendations are made based upon the findings of this research.

參考文獻


中文文獻
1. 王平、張原豐、邵子軒、郭溥村、羅濟群、陳裕禎(2013)。專利分析與技術創新-以互動式遊戲專利佈局為例。資訊管理學報20卷,1,39-76。
2. 王受之(1997)。世界現代設計。台北市:藝術家。
3. 王俊傑、陳達仁、黃慕萱(2007)。從專利觀點比較台灣與南韓技術創新能力(1987-2006)。智慧財產評論5卷,2,31-51。
4. 王靜亭(2002)。台灣木製家具產業設計策略之研究(碩士論文)。取自台灣碩博士論文知識加值系統。

延伸閱讀