透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.15.156.140
  • 學位論文

亞洲新興市場金融業經營績效與效率-亞洲金融風暴前後之跨國比較

The Performance and Efficiency of the Financial Industry in Asian Emerging Market - The Comparison of Cross Countries between pre- and post- Asian Financial Crisis

指導教授 : 劉定焜
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


隨著國際化趨勢,金融產業面臨市場開放、對外競爭與經營業務創新等挑戰,進而造就多元的金融市場。由於金融全球化,美國次級房貸風暴影響擴及全國,使得全球股市大幅下跌,各國經濟衰退,造成投資人前所未有的恐慌。經由亞洲金融危機與美國金融風暴的教訓,各國紛紛提出金融改革,提升競爭力、增加經營績效與營運效率,藉此穩定金融產業。因此,深入探討金融產業之經營績效與效率具有其價值與必要性。 近年來新興市場廣受全球矚目,拉丁美洲、東歐與亞洲這三大新興市場中,亞洲新興市場的發展備受好評。以往銀行績效的文獻中,大多僅探討單一國家 (Banker et al., 2010;Hsiao et al., 2010;Siriopoulos and Tziogkidis, 2010;Holod and Lewis, 2011等),跨國研究則以拉丁美洲、歐洲以及經濟轉型的國家為主 (Bonin et al., 2004;Koutsomanoli-Filippaki et al., 2008;Brissimis et al., 2008等),針對亞洲新興市場探討的文獻並不多。因此,本研究針對亞洲七國新興市場國家,分別為台灣、印度、印尼、南韓、馬來西亞、菲律賓與巴基斯坦為研究對象,建構1991年至2005年,共367家商業銀行的企業別平衡型縱橫資料 (firm-level balanced panel data),進一步探討亞洲新興市場各國金融市場銀行經營績效之影響因素。此外,除財務變數外,亦加入非財務變數,考慮新巴賽爾協議 (Basel Ⅲ) 議題,納入信用評等與風險變數。由於金融業經營深受景氣影響,為使銀行經營績效的探討更具備完整性,亦加入總體環境變數之考量。 本研究運用資料包絡分析法 (Data envelopment analysis;以下簡稱DEA),估計各國銀行之效率值,探討經營效率,為進一步比較新興市場國家在亞洲金融風暴前後效率表現之差異與排名,將樣本期間以1997年予以區隔。相較於過去的研究,本研究具備更完整的研究期間與更詳盡的變數及樣本資料,並進一步選擇最適panel data模型與DEA進行實證分析及跨國分析比較。 經營績效之實證結果發現,在亞洲新興市場七個國家中,不論是亞洲金融風暴前與後,Spread、ROE與ROA模式中影響銀行績效決定因素最重要的變數分別為流動性、自有資本比率與行政成本。其中,流動性以及自有資本比率為正向影響,而行政成本與ROA、ROE為負向影響,與Spread為正向影響。 銀行效率之實證結果發現,於完整的研究年度其效率最好的前三名國家分別為韓國、菲律賓、台灣與馬來西亞,其中台灣與馬來西亞並列第三名。亞洲金融風暴前,效率最好的前三名國家分別為菲律賓、馬來西亞與韓國。亞洲金融風暴後,效率最好的前三名國家分別為韓國、菲律賓與巴基斯坦。

並列摘要


With the trend of globalization, opening of financial markets, competition of foreign banks, acquisition and innovation, that brings about different features in financial industry. In addition, the US subprime mortgage crisis has evolved into a global financial tsunami, global stock markets fell sharply, bringing economic recession, and causing scare of investors. Because getting some lessons from Asian and American financial crisis, many countries had reformed to stabilize financial industry. Therefore, the investigation of the determinants of performance and measurement of banking performance would be worthy by further researching. In recent years, the emerging market especially the Asian is the most import and discussed market. The past literatures most detect single country, for example Banker et al., 2010;Hsiao et al., 2010;Siriopoulos and Tziogkidis, 2010;Holod and Lewis, 2011. The studies of cross country focus on country of Latin America and Europe, for example Bonin et al., 2004;Koutsomanoli-Filippaki et al., 2008;Brissimis et al., 2008. Therefore, this paper constructs 1991-2005 financial industry firm-level panel data of Asian emerging market countries for further explore the determinants of bank performance. Besides, except financial variables, this paper considers the credit rating and risk variables, that rare used by former researches. This study uses the data envelopment analysis to calculate the efficiency values as proxy of performance to compare with Asian emerging market countries banks operating efficiency and ranking. Compare with previous studies, this study extension of the period and with more detailed variables. We hope the empirical results would provide some valuable information for government, firms, investors and the further study. Operating performance empirical results show that in seven countries of Asian emerging market, the determinants of bank performance in Spread、ROE and ROA models are Liquidity、Equity and Costs. Liquidity and Equity have the positive effects, but Costs with ROA and ROE have the negative effects, and with Spread have the positive effects. Banking efficiency empirical results show that the top three countries separately are Korea, Philippines, Taiwan and Malaysia in study period. Pre-crisis, the top three countries separately are Philippines, Malaysia and Korea. Post-crisis, the top three countries separately are Korea, Philippines and Pakistan.

參考文獻


朱炫璉與吳志銘 (2009)。台灣金融控股組織對銀行效率之影響。台灣管理學刊,第9卷 第一期,2009年2月,97-114。
沈中華與林智勇 (2009)。銀行民營化的績效表現-配對理論的應用。經濟論文,中央研究院經濟研究所,37:3 (2009), 369-405.
姚國中 (2008)。臺灣銀行業科技服務創新與績效之研究。未出版碩士論文。國立臺灣大學社會科學院經濟學系,台北。
陳怡凱與林詣宸 (2010)。台灣銀行業是否受惠於多角化經營?以收入與放款為例。管理評論,第29卷,第4期,2010年10月,pp.39-67。
黃台心、張寶光與邱郁芳 (2009)。應用共同成本函數探討東亞陸國銀行業之生產效率。經濟論文,中央研究院經濟研究所,37:1 (2009), 61-100.

被引用紀錄


嚴曉萍(2013)。台灣金控與非金控銀行效率與生產力─金融風暴前後之實證探討〔碩士論文,朝陽科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0078-2712201314042048
李育瑋(2013)。本國銀行與外商銀行經營績效影響因素之探討〔碩士論文,朝陽科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0078-2712201314042170
顏惠虹(2014)。公股銀行與民營銀行之經營績效- 金融海嘯前後比較分析〔碩士論文,朝陽科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0078-2611201410182750

延伸閱讀