透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.139.70.131
  • 學位論文

廣告訴求與說服策略對消費矛盾與購買意圖之影響

The Effectiveness of Green Advertising Appeal and Persuade Strategy in Consumers’ ambivalence and Purchase

指導教授 : 吳文貴
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


本研究目的在於探討利己、利他綠色廣告訴求,以及不同的說服文案,對消費者購買綠色產品之矛盾態度、品質認知與價格認知的影響。本研究採實驗法,並利用2(綠色廣告訴求:利己訴求與利他訴求) x 4(說服策略:社會證明、一致性、互惠、權威)之問卷設計,探討是否影響矛盾情結、品質認知、價格認知,以及購買意圖。本研究發現: 一、權威說服策略對於品質認知、購買意圖有顯著正向影響,但相較於其他說服策略,其矛盾情結較低。 二、品質認知對於購買意圖有顯著正向影響。 三、矛盾情結對於購買意圖有顯著負向影響。 根據本研究之結果,建議行銷人員設計廣告文案時,可以將權威說服策略做為內容依據,進而達到較佳的廣告效果。

並列摘要


The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of different green advertising appeals and persuasive copies on consumers’ ambivalent attitudes, perceived quality and perceived price of green products.We recruited students (N=250) from a university in middle of Taiwan to participate in our experiment that was comprised of a 2 (egoism and altruism appeal) × 4 (persuasion copies: social proof, consistency, reciprocity and authority) factorial research design. Thus, we designed eight advertisements with different combinations of green appeals and persuasive copies for shower cream. The results show that a green ad with an authoritative persuasion copy generates lower degree of ambivalence toward green products, higher perceived quality and higher purchase intention of green products. The higher the perceived quality of green products is, the more consumers are willing to purchase green products. We also found that the ambivalence is negatively related to purchase intention of green products. According to the results, this study suggest that no matter what green appeals are adopted, the authoritative persuasion copy might lead to higher purchase intention of green products.

參考文獻


4.沈玉瑛(2001)。競爭策略與訂價策略配合對新產品績效影響之研究--以產品專利類型為分析。未出版之碩士論文,中原大學,桃園。
5.吳美惠、翁儷禎、李明濱、王秀紅、熊秉荃(2006) 。重鬱症病患社會支持、互惠性、衝突與憂鬱程度之相關性研究。臺灣精神醫學,20(2),116-123。
7.吳淑玉(2010)。利他、利己綠色廣告訴求對廣告效果之研究-以環境知識為干擾變數。碩士論文,淡江大學國際商學研究所,臺北。
11.林美吟(2008),利他、利己綠色廣告訴求之廣告效果研究-以綠色生活型態為干擾變數。碩士論文,淡江大學國際貿易學系國際企業系研究所,臺北。
15.黃恆獎、蕭廣仲(1994)。綠色行銷與消費者購買行為之結構性分析。管理評論,14(2),21-40。

延伸閱讀