透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.223.172.252
  • 期刊

預防原則之研究-國際環境法處理欠缺科學證據之環境風險議題之努力與爭議

Precautionary Principle-Efforts and Controversies in Establishing and Implementing Rules for Environmental Risks with Scientific Uncertainty in International Environmental Law

摘要


預防原則爲國際環境法中發展出以處理關於具有科學不確定性的環境風險之權宜性指導方針。預防原則雖然立意甚佳,但因國際間對於環境議題所持之態度與立場有所不同,故對於預防原則之具體內涵、實踐方式,甚至法律效果與法律地位等皆無共識,而引發不少爭議。本文茲就國際環境法發展之重要概念與精神,與其對於預防原則之孕育,國際間透過多邊環境協定對於預防原則之引用與法典化所作之努力,以及國際法院、國際海洋法法庭與世界貿易組織等涉及預防原則之爭端案例,分別進行分析與介紹;以探討預防原則在發展過程中受到之影響與牽制,並進而針對預防原則之爭議性法律議題,以及其所涵蓋之範圍與應有之實質內涵與構成要件加以釐清。

並列摘要


Precautionary Principle is one of the major legal principles that developed in international environmental law in the last decade, and is aimed to deal with environmental risks or impacts with no scientific certainty. The concept of precautionary principle was built in the 1992 Rio Declaration and sold to the global accordingly. By far, precautionary principle has been applied and referred in several MEAs and international dispute cases. However, no uniform understanding of its meaning is reached, amongst states and commentators. The present paper therefore seeks to address the controversies of this very principle by means of exploring the background, i.e. the special features of international environmental law, for developing precautionary principle. Attentions will therefore be made to clarify the nature and scope of precautionary principle. It is suggested that precautionary principle should function as a guideline in the decision-making process of risk management. It is therefore the aim of the present paper to examine the legal interpretations and significance of precautionary principle and to propose a structure of the contents of precautionary principle, so as to identify the preconditions for applying, and major directions provided in, this principle.

參考文獻


葉俊榮(1999)。全球環境議題-台灣觀點。巨流出版社。
J. H. Adler(2000).More Sorry Than Safe: Assessing the Precautionary Principle and the Proposed International Biosafety Protocol.Texas International Law Journal.35,173-205.
K. A. Ambrose(2000).Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) and Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS): Science and the WTO.Law and Policy in International Business.31,861-868.
N. A. Ashford(1999).A Conceptual Framework for the Use of Precautionary Principle in Law.(Protecting Public Health and the Environment).
R. E. Benedick(1991).(Ozone Diplomacy).

被引用紀錄


陳明宗(2018)。我國環境法制架構之研究-以環境公民訴訟制度為中心〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu201800025
溫欽閔(2015)。我國水污染防治法管制措施之檢討 – 以風險管理之運用為中心〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu201500970
張淳美(2017)。臺灣《營業秘密法》發展之研究:以新興風險治理原則為中心〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201702036
顏嘉誼(2017)。論國家管轄範圍外海洋生物多樣性養護與可持續利用〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201700003
陳佳琦(2016)。論預防原則於風險管制措施之適用及法律上界線 ─ 以電子菸之管制措施為例〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201610191

延伸閱讀