透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.138.110.119
  • 期刊

公司法第二十七條法人董監事制度存廢之研究

A Study of the Maintaining or Repealing of Legal Persons as Corporate Directors or Supervisors under Article 27 of the Company Act

摘要


法人董監事制度在我國存在已久,然而,由於實際運作中,除了發生法人代表忠於所代表之法人及忠於擔任董監事之公司間之角色與利益衝突之現象外,根據目前公司法第27條之規定,法人得指派其代表人同時當選為董事及監察人。這個規範所造成的結果,將嚴重破壞公司治理內部監控機制之功能。尤其,當董事依法必須負擔民事賠償責任時,究竟係擔任法人董事之法人或其代表人要負起賠償責任,抑或連帶負責,根據目前法令之規定,亦容易產生爭議。再加上法人董監事代表得隨時改派之規定,更增添問題之複雜性。因此,廢除法人董監事制度之聲浪因應而起。 本文撰寫之目的在於針對上述問題進行深入探討,透過我國法人董監事制度之介紹與探詢外國法制之規範,分析法人董監事制度存廢之優缺,以及與公司治理之關連,期望能對於法人董監事制度廢除後所可能產生之衝擊與問題,提出解決之道。本文之立場乃建議廢除法人董監事制度,然而,如仍認為我國目前不宜貿然廢除該制度,在相關規範的設計上,本文亦會提出法人董監事制度廢除前之修正芻議與其他配套措施,期望得以緩解法人董監事制度存在本身所產生的爭議問題。

並列摘要


That legal persons or their representatives can be appointed as directors has been a recognized and controversial legal regime in Taiwan. Although Taiwan is not the only country permitting legal person as corporate director, the current rules as set forth under Article 27 of the Company Act do create some legal disputes. Because a legal person must designate a natural person to perform the duties when elected as director, the first issue arising from this practice is whether the legal person or the natural person bears the responsibility of a director? Another controversy deriving from Section 2 and 3 of Article 27, allowing a legal person to designate representatives to be elected as directors and supervisors and to replace them anytime. This article looks into the evolution of regime of the legal person director and comment on the inappropriateness of Article 27 as a matter of law and practice. This article will also provide discussion on the legal person director regimes of other jurisdictions. This article proposes to repeal Article 27. It also proposal alternative resolution if legal person is still allowed to be the director.

參考文獻


王文宇(2000)。法人股東,法人代表與公司間三方法律關係之定位。台灣本土法學雜誌。14,102-107。
王文宇(2003)。新公司與企業法。台北=Taipei:元照=Angle。
王文宇(2005)。公司法論。台北=Taipei:元照=Angle。
立法院公報處 (2007)。〈立法院第6屆第5會期第6次會議紀錄〉,《立法院公報》,96卷54期,頁270-282。(Official Gazette Department of The Legislative Yuan [2007]. The records of 6th sitting in 5th sessions, 6th appointed dated. Legislative Yuan Gazette, 96[54], 270-282.)
立法院公報處 (2009)。〈立法院第7屆第4會期第4次會議〉,《立法院公報》,98卷31期,頁4-5。(Official Gazette Department of The Legislative Yuan[2009]. The records of 4th sitting in 4th sessions, 7th appointed dated. Legislative Yuan Gazette, 98[31], 4-5.)

被引用紀錄


陳傑明(2017)。我國董事會單軌制之檢討與再建構〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201702188
邵慶平(2019)。實力派股東本位公司法制的實踐、衝突與改革:以股東會決議爭議為中心臺大法學論叢48(1),329-390。https://doi.org/10.6199/NTULJ.201903_48(1).0007
鄭翔致(2012)。實質董事之責任與規制〔碩士論文,國立臺北大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0023-1209201211071700
劉 嘉 松(2012)。法人董監事型態與公司經營績效之關聯性〔碩士論文,國立臺北大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0023-3008201214153400
傅慧欣(2013)。法人董事結構與公司績效間之關聯性〔碩士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201613535873

延伸閱讀