大專院校公開一級棒球選手知覺教練領導行為、團隊凝聚力與滿意度相關之研究

Research on the relationship between coach leadership behavior, team cohesion and satisfaction in a college baseball player

陳威成 ； 游正忠

《長榮運動休閒學刊》 14期 (2020/06) Pp. 45-57

摘要

本研究主要目的在探討大專院校公開一級棒球隊選手知覺教練領導行為、團隊凝聚力與滿意度之相關情形。採問卷調查方式進行，以知覺教練領導行為量表、團隊凝聚力量表及滿意度量表為研究工具，選取107學年度公開一級棒球隊共439人為研究對象，以描述性統計、單因子變異數分析、Scheffe事後檢定法、皮爾森積差相關及多元逐步迴歸加以分析，結果發現：一、大專院校公開一級棒球隊選手知覺教練領導行為得分最高為「訓練與指導行為」得分最高，「權威行為」得分最低。二、團隊凝聚力四個構面中以「人際吸引」得分最高，「人際親和」得分最低。三、大專院校公開一級棒球隊選手在訓練滿意度上，以「教練領導與訓練內容」得分最高、其次為「個人與整體表現」。四、不同背景變項對於公開一級棒球選手知覺教練領導行為、團隊凝聚力與訓練滿意度，僅在學校類型達顯著相關意義、年級、球齡、守備位置並未有顯著不同。五、在教練領導行為、團隊凝聚力與訓練滿意度整體相關性上，呈現中度相關意義（P＜.05,r=0.389,r=0.558），亦即知覺較高教練領導行為選手，有較高滿意度產生，同時也有較高團隊凝聚力。六、團隊凝聚力、教練領導行為構面中最能有效預測滿意度為「人際吸引」與「關懷行為」，解釋量為35.6%。

關鍵字

領導行為 ； 團隊凝聚力 ； 多元逐步迴歸

並列摘要

The main purpose of this study is to explore the situation of the coaching leadership behavior, team cohesion and satisfaction of the first-class baseball team players in colleges and universities. This study was conducted by means of questionnaire survey. The Perceived Coach Leadership Behavior Scale, Team Cohesion Power Table and Satisfaction Scale were used as research tools. A total of 439 open-ended baseball teams in colleges and universities in 107 academic years were selected as research objects. Descriptive statistics, single factor analysis, independent sample t test, Scheffe post hoc test, Pearson product difference correlation and multiple stepwise regression analysis, after discussion, found that: First, college and university A first-class baseball team players perceive coach leadership behavior scores highest ＂training and pointing. The ＂guided behavior＂ scored the highest, the ＂care behavior＂ followed, and the ＂authoritative behavior＂ scored the lowest. Second, the team's cohesiveness has the highest score in ＂interpersonal attraction＂ and ＂teamwork＂ in the four face ＂Interpersonal affinity＂ scored the lowest. Third, college and university A first-class baseball team players in the training satisfaction, ＂training leadership and training content＂ score. The highest, followed by ＂personal and overall performance.＂ Fourth, different background variables for colleges and universities, a level 1 baseball player perception coach leadership behavior, team cohesion and. Training satisfaction, only in the school type, significant significance, grade, age, and defensive position are not obvious different. 5. A moderately relevant meaning in the overall correlation between coach leadership behavior, team cohesion and training satisfaction. (P＜.05, r=0.389, r=0.558), which means that the coaches with higher perceptions are highly competitive. Health, but also a high degree of team cohesion. Sixth, team cohesion, coach leadership behavioral facet can best predict satisfaction as ＂interpersonal attraction＂ and ＂off＂ ＂Hua behavior＂, the interpretation is 35.6%.

並列關鍵字

leadership behavior ； team cohesion ； multiple stepwise regression

參考文獻

王明月（2010）。桌球教練領導行為與組織氣氛、團隊凝聚力、運動滿意度之結構模式，大專體育學刊，12（3），53-64。

王俊文（2013）。大專院校甲組棒球選手知覺教練領導行為與滿意度相關之研究。未出版碩士論文，高雄市，高苑科技大學經營管理研究所。

吳志汶（2010）。台灣地區高中棒球運動教練領導行為與選手訓練滿意度之研究。未出版碩士論文，基隆市，經國管理暨健康學院健康產業管理研究所。

吳慧卿 （2001）。選手知覺教練領導行為、團隊衝突、團隊凝聚力及滿意度之實證研究。未出版博士論文，台北市，國立台灣師範大學體育研究所。

邱旺璋 （2002）。足球教練領導行為與團隊凝聚力之相關研究。未出版碩士論文，台北縣，輔仁大學體育學系碩士班。