透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.217.210.147
  • 期刊

梁啟超與中國現代史學之追尋

Liang Qichao and the Search for China's Modern Historiography

摘要


梁啟超的史學思想是中國現代史學的開端,透露出二十世紀以來中國史學發展的重要方向。許多學者(如唐小兵與王晴佳)都指出任公的史學思想主要可以分為兩個階段,一為1902年〈新史學〉時期,注重科學史學、啟蒙史學與演化史觀;一為1920年代《中國歷史研究法》出版之後,轉而強調歷史、文化的獨特性與多元性。這樣的轉變是如何產生的呢?就外在的因素來說,歐戰的刺激,以及德國歷史主義、新康德主義的影響,無疑地具有關鍵地位,但是任公思想與傳統學術的關係亦不容忽略。本文嘗試從任公與中國佛學與儒家傳統的關聯性來說明任公所建立的中國現代史學及其延展,不僅是引進西方觀念,也是將西方思想與傳統學術融洽地結合在一起。此一史學路徑和任公畢生對「現代」學術的追尋密不可分。

並列摘要


Liang Qichao's historiographical thought represents the beginning of modern Chinese historiography and reveals some important directions of Chinese historiography in the twentieth century. As pointed out by many scholars, recently including Tang Xiaobing and Edward Wang, the development of Liang's historiographical thought can be divided into two stages. First, Liang's 1902 ”New Historiography,” published in his New Citizen Journal, emphasized scientific, Enlightenment, and evolutionary vision of history. The second stage emerged in the 1920s, especially with the publication of Liang's Methods for the Study of Chinese History. Here he emphasized the uniqueness and multiplicity of history and culture and criticized the Western-centered, evolutionary historiography that he had earlier advocated. How did this change occur? In terms of external reasons, the impact of World War I and the influence of German historicism and Neo-Kantianism played crucial roles. Yet Liang's relationship with Chinese traditional scholarship also contributed to this change. This paper argues that Liang's ”new historiography” in both stages was based on the Buddhist and Confucian traditions to a considerable extent. Thus he not only introduced Western ideas but also sought convergence between Western ideas and concepts rooted in Chinese tradition. His efforts to establish a ”new historiography” cannot be separated from his lifetime search for ”modern” scholarship for China.

參考文獻


Georg G.Iggers,Iggers(1962).The Image of Ranke in American and German Historical Thought.History and Theory.2(1),17-40.
Langlois, Charles V.(1926)。史學原論
A., Alasdair C.Macintyre,Macintyre(1981).After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory.
Metzger, Thomas A.(2001)。形上思維與歷史性的思想規矩:論郁振華教授的《形上的智慧如何可能?─中國現代哲學的沈思》。清華大學學報:哲學社會科學版。16(6)
Metzger, Thomas A.(2002)。道統的世界化:論牟宗三、鄭家棟與追求批判意識的歷程。社會理論學報。5(1)

被引用紀錄


歐陽廷杰(2016)。錢牟異同-錢穆與牟宗三之朱子思想詮釋的比較研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201600924
方俠文(2006)。梁啟超晚年(1918-1929)學術思想研究─以清代學術研究、先秦諸子研究為例〔博士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2006.10216
林志宏(2005)。民國乃敵國也:清遺民與近代中國政治文化的轉變〔博士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2005.00854

延伸閱讀