大學男生初學網球正反手拍著地球的教學效果分析（下）

曾賢亮

《臺大體育》 13期 (1988/10) Pp. 21-45

https://doi.org/10.6568/NTUPES.198810_(13).0001

並列摘要

This study, which was based upon an experiment for ninety male students of the National Taiwan University who willingly chose to learn tennis, was to explore:
1) the effect of teaching fore-hand ground stroke and backhand ground stroke, and the effect of learning mental practice on three groups of students.
2) the transfer effect of fore-hand ground stroke and backhand ground stroke.
3) the influence of basic phsical ability on the learning results.
4) the students' answers to the questionnaires about the difficulty of learning the two strokes and their evaluation about the learning order of the two strokes.
The results of this experiment were derived from the following statistic methods: Two-Factor ANOVA, Tukey-Method, Step wise Regression Procedure, and χ^2 and the conclusions are:
1) The comparison among the three groups about the effects of learning the two strokes and the effects of mental practice.
Significant differences exist because of different teaching menthods: Group A (which. was taught back-hand ground stroke first) had the best learning result; Group C (which was taught fore-hand ground stroke and back-hand ground stroke simultaneously) came next; Group B (which was taught fore-hand ground stroke first) had the worst learning result.
The result of mental practice depends on the order of learning the two strokes: for those who learned the easier forehand ground stroke first, their learning results had nothing to do with mental practice; i, e., whether they performed mental practice or not did not affect their results. For those who learned the more difficult back-hand ground stroke forst, mental practice did help improve their results.
2) The transfer effect of fore-hand ground stroke and backhand ground stroke.
The transfer effect ratio of Group A from back-hand ground stroke to fore-hand ground stroke is greater than the transfer effect ratio of Group B from fore-hand ground stroke to backhand ground stroke.
3) The average results of learning the two strokes are influenced by coordination, accuracy and grip. The result of learning fore-hand ground stroke is influenced by coordination and stature. The result of learning back-hand ground stroke is influenced by agility and grip.
4) The outcome of the questionnaires:
a) Each of the three groups considered fore-hand ground stroke easier to learn before and after they learned to play tennis. The answers of the students were very consistent.
b) After learning both strokes, Group A thought both were easy to learn. Group B, however, thought that fore-hand ground stroke was easy but back-hand ground stroke was difficult.
c) All of the three groups agreed that back-hand ground stroke should be taught first in the process of learning tennis.