並列摘要
According to traditional historical accounts, the Kalewan Battle is generally deemed as barbarian rebellions in the process of Han settlements that demand the state's suppression. From the Indigenous Peoples' perspective, on the other hand, this is the resistance for their own survival in the face of alien encroachments on their lands. In this study, we will begin with understanding of how this event has taken place based on earlier accomplishments of historians. We will then endeavor to test the robustness of the conceptual framework of politicizing identity of ethnic minorities that we have developed elsewhere. Our focuses will on who the Manchurian government decided to deal with the incident, and how that Kalewan elites reacted to the state's policy.
參考文獻
延伸閱讀
- 徐吉志（2011）。台灣地方行政區劃的始末與發展。中國地方自治，64(10)，20-46。https://doi.org/10.6581/lsgc.2011.64(10).03
- 黃居正、邱盈翠（2015）。台灣原住民族集體同意權之規範與實踐。臺灣民主季刊，12(3)，43-82。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=17269350-201509-201511180023-201511180023-43-82
- 李福清（2008）。原始(archaic)神話與發達神話瑣議－以臺灣原住民與中國大陸古代神話為例。興大中文學報，(23)，3-18。https://doi.org/10.30091/JCDNCHU.200811.0002
- 陳國棟（1997）。Some Qualitative Speculation on the History of East Taiwan。東台灣研究，(2)，31-41。https://doi.org/10.6275/JETS.2.31-41.1997
- 潘朝陽（2020）。On Education of the History of Taiwan That Allows the Nation to Perish。鵝湖月刊，(543)，0-1。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=18133738-202009-202011090012-202011090012-0-1