過去領導的研究大多聚焦在教練領導行為,但近幾年研究議題逐漸轉移至同儕領導行為,然而鮮少關注在同時比較教練及同儕領導行為的差異情形及對團隊滿意度的預測效果。再者,臺灣高中與大學的訓練文化有許多差異之處。因此,本研究目的為探討高中、大學選手知覺教練及同儕領導行為之差異及團隊滿意度之預測。結果發現高中選手知覺教練展現較多訓練與指導、民主行為、關懷行為及獎勵行為;大學選手知覺教練展現較多專制行為。此外,大學選手知覺同儕領導者展現較多任務領導、外部領導及個人才能。另一方面,高中同儕與大學教練領導行為對團隊滿意度的單純解釋變異量較高。本研究結論為教練與同儕在不同階段的領導行為有所差異,而教練的角色除了發展適合其團隊的領導行為之外,也應該發掘團隊中展現不同同儕領導行為的領導者,進而滿足與增進選手對團隊的滿意度。
A large proportion of earlier research on leadership behaviors has focused on the coach leadership behaviors, but recent research has transferred focus onto peer leadership behaviors. However, only few studies have investigated the difference between coach and peer leadership, and their corresponding effects on team satisfaction. Furthermore, there are many differences in the training culture of university and senior high school coaches in Taiwan. The purpose of the present study was two-fold. The first purpose was to investigate the differences in coach and peer leadership behaviors of university and senior high school. Secondly, it also examines the predictive utility of coach and peer leadership behaviors on team satisfaction. The participants of this study are student athletes from sports teams of ten different sports. Results indicated that high school student athletes perceived more coach leadership behaviors of training instruction, democratic, social, and positive behaviors than university student athletes. In addition, university student athletes perceived more peer leadership behaviors of task, external, and personal talent than high school student athletes. On the other hand, the peer leadership behaviors in high school and coach leadership behaviors in university have higher explained variances on team satisfaction. We conclude that coaches and peers differ in leadership behaviors at different stages. Furthermore, the role of the coach lies not only in the development of leadership behaviors in the team, but also in the uncovering of different peer leadership behaviors of leaders within the team to further promote team satisfaction.