透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.142.96.146
  • 期刊

失眠嚴重度量表中文版的信、效度研究

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of Insomnia Severity Index

摘要


目的:本研究的目的在於檢驗失眠嚴重度量表-中文版(Insomnia Severity Index- Chinese Version; ISI-C)的信、效度。方法:本研究共分兩部分,先針對147位失眠患者及182位正常睡眠者進行ISI-C及中文版匹茲堡睡眠品質量表(Pittsburgh Sleep QualityIndex-Chinese Version; CPSQI)等量表的施測,再針對71位參與失眠認知行為治療的失眠患者,進行ISI-C以及睡眠日誌的前、後測。結果:ISI-C顯示相當好的內部一致性(Chronbach's α=0.94),且修正後的項目-全量表相關係數皆達顯著。在效度方面,與CPSQI的總分相關達.88,與睡眠日誌的相關參數則有低度到中度的顯著相關,得分在認知行為治療後也有顯著的下降。ROC分析顯示以9分為切分點有良好的敏感度(91.8%)與特異度(91.2%)。結論:研究結果顯示ISI-C有良好的信、效度,為非常方便的失眠篩檢工具,也可以做為失眠治療的療效測量工具。

關鍵字

失眠 量表 信度 內部一致性 效度 切分點 敏感度 特異度

並列摘要


Objective: The study was conducted to examine the psychometric properties of the Insomnia Severity Index-Chinese version (ISI-C).Method: Study 1 recruited 147 insomnia patients from a general hospital and 182 normal sleepers from local communities. A package of questionnaires including the ISI-C and the Chinese version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (CPSQI) were administered to all subjects. Study 2 included 71 patients with insomnia complaints who went through a 6-session program of cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I). The ISI-C and sleep diaries were given to the participants before and after the CBT-I program.Results: The results showed very good internal consistency of the ISI-C, with a Chronbach's α coefficient of 0.94. Corrected item-total items correlations were all significant. In terms of validity, ISI-C showed very good concurrent validity with the CPSQI. The total scores of these two scales correlated significantly (r = .88). The correlations between most of the items of the two scales also reached moderate to high correlations. The correlations between ISI-C items and corresponding indices derived from sleep diaries were also significant, although most of them were in the low to moderate correlation range. Furthermore, patients' scores on the ISI-C decreased significantly after receiving CBT-I program, reflecting the beneficial effects of treatment. Regarding construct validity, factor analysis revealed a single factor that can explain 73.94% of the variance. ROC analysis showed a best cut-off point of 9, with very good sensitivity (91.8%) and specificity (91.2%).Conclusion: The ISI-C has good internal consistency and validity. It can be a sensitive and specific tool for screening insomnia and a good outcome measure to evaluate the treatment effects of insomnia treatments.

並列關鍵字

insomnia rating scale reliability validity sensitivity specificity

參考文獻


Morin, C. M.(1993). Insomnia: psychological assessment and management. New York: Guilford Press.
林詩淳、楊建銘、許世杰 (民95年3月)。失眠嚴重度量表、睡前激發程度量表及睡眠失功能信念及態度量表中譯版之信效度研究。台灣睡眠醫學學會九十五年度會員大會,p.43-44。
AASM(2005). International Classification of Sleep Disorders(ICSD-2)(2nd edn ed.). Westchester, IL: AASM.
Aloba, O.O., Adewuya, A.O., Ola, B.A., Mapayi, B.M. (2007). Validity of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)among Nigerian university students. Sleep Medicine, 8(3), 266-70.
American-Psychiatric-Association(1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders(Fourth ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.

被引用紀錄


Hu, N. C. (2014). 工作因子與疲勞之相關性研究 [master's thesis, National Taiwan University]. Airiti Library. https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2014.00760
林心伃(2014)。失眠者的注意偏誤: 以睡眠相關刺激的點偵測作業為焦點〔碩士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201613572765

延伸閱讀