透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.146.105.194
  • 期刊

認真休閒者之動機、承諾與休閒結果關係之研究-以非營利組織志工爲例

The Relationships among Motivations, Commitment and Outcomes of Leisure on Serious Leisure Participants: An Empirical Study of Nonprofit Organizational Volunteers

摘要


本研究以Heintzman與Mannell(2003)所發展的模型爲基礎,實證於參與非營利組織之志願服務者(志工),同時考量認真休閒者之堅毅特質,欲測試志工之休閒承諾是否在其休閒動機與休閒結果(包括:精神效益與精神福利)之間扮演著中介變數的角色。本研究首先依據文獻進行模式界定與提出二組對立模式,其次調查288位非宗教志工之問卷,運用線性結構關係模式進行模式識別,並且探討認真型休閒者之休閒動機、休閒承諾、休閒精神效益與精神福利等構念間的關係;最後,以158位宗教型志工來驗證模式之概化效度。研究結果證實二組志工的休閒承諾確實在假設的模型中成爲完全中介的角色,本文的貢獻爲:將Heintzman與Mannell(2003)的研究模型延伸至認真型休閒的理論,以針對「認真型休閒行爲」提出一套較適宜的理論模式。最後依據本研究之發現,提供非營利組織於志工招募與訓練等建議。

並列摘要


This research was based on the model that was developed by Heintzman & Mannell (2003). The targets of this study were the volunteers of nonprofit organizations. The persistency of volunteers was particularly considered. This research tested if leisure commitment is a mediator between leisure motivations and leisure outcomes (e.g., spiritual benefit and spiritual well-being). First, this research was in accord with literature in order to specify a hypothetical model, and proposes two rival models. Second, the model developed examines 288 non-religious volunteers to identify the fit of proposed model. Structural equation modeling using LISREL was employed to test the relationships among leisure motivations, leisure commitment and leisure outcomes. Finally, the model generalization was demonstrated among the samples of 158 religious volunteers. Results revealed leisure commitment serves as a critical mediator in hypothetical model in the two groups. The contribution of this study is to extend Heintzman and Mannell's model of serious leisure theory, and proposes a suitable theory model for serious leisure participants. Finally, the results provide some suggestions about recruitment and training volunteers for nonprofit organizations.

參考文獻


林大翔、張家銘、黃芳銘(2005)。休閒教育親子運動會服務品質競爭模式比較之研究。戶外研究遊憩。18(1),1-22。
Anderson, J. C.,Gerbing, D. W.(1988).Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommends two-step approach.(Psychological Bulletin).
Bagozzi, R. P.,Yi, Y.(1988).On the evaluation of structure equations models.Academic of Marketing Science.16(1),76-94.
Beanl, J. G.,Raghep, M. G.(1983).Measuring leisure motivation.Journal of Leisure Research.15(3),219-228.
Brown, B. A.,Frankel, B. G.,Fennell, M.(1991).Happiness through leisure: The impact of type of leisure activity, age, gender and leisure satisfaction on psychological well-being.Journal of Applied Recreation Research.16(4),368-392.

被引用紀錄


吳雅筠(2007)。休閒緩衝壓力模式與休閒壓抑壓力模式比較分析之研究〔碩士論文,國立高雄餐旅大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6825/NKUHT.2007.00006
徐苹甄(2013)。企業社會責任與員工幸福感—深度休閒之志工角色認知之調節與中介效用驗證〔碩士論文,國立高雄師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6817/NKNU.2013.00018
楊筑鈞、謝百淇(2022)。國家公園解說志工的生態認同之初探科學教育學刊30(2),171-192。https://doi.org/10.6173/CJSE.202206_30(2).0004
路暢平(2009)。泡茶師深度休閒與遊憩專門化之關係〔碩士論文,亞洲大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0118-1511201215461732
廖文琴(2010)。學校志工認真休閒特質與休閒效益之關係〔碩士論文,亞洲大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0118-1511201215464181

延伸閱讀