透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.136.154.103
  • 期刊

(後)社會主義國家經改策略的政治選擇-以匈牙利、中國大陸、波蘭為例

(Post) Socialism Country's Political Choice of the Economic Reform: Hungary, PRC and Poland

若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


本文主要想回答一個問題:對於正在脫離社會主義經濟體制的轉型國家而言,究竟會選擇什麼樣的策略來進行經濟改革?為什麼? 過去一般以正當性變項來對此進行解釋。筆者除反駁此項論述外,並提出一個假設命題:經政初始階段,執政者與舊政權的政經網絡關係決定經改策略的選擇,如果執政者繼承前政權的政經網絡,將偏向採取漸進改革,而如果執政者的政經網絡與舊政權越不同,則越有可能採取震盪療法。並以匈牙利、中國大陸與波蘭為例來驗證此假說。

並列摘要


The article is mainly to answer a question: To those (Post) Socialism Countries, which Transition from Socialism, What kind of strategy they will choose to push economic reform? Why? In the past, most scholars thought communism government didn't dare to take actions of the shock therapy and privatize because communism government wanted to maintain the legitimacy of ideology. While a new authority that has the legitimacy of democracy would take steps of the shock therapy. This paper doesn't agree with this discourse, and adduces a hypothetic: In the beginning of the economic reform, the strategy of economic reform opportunity decides on new authorities and the past governor's relationship. If the new authorities follow former relationship, they will take actions of the gradualism. On the contrary, the more different relationship of the new authorities has, the more chances they will take actions of the shock therapy. Then the author will take Hungary, PRC and Poland for example to prove this hypothetic. In order to answer above questions, this paper will divide the article into six parts: the first part is preface to declare the author's question and viewpoint; the second part is to discuss the shock therapy and gradualism, then review correlative articles to lead the writer's hypothetic; the third part will take Hungary for instance to controvert the legitimacy discourse and review the author's hypothetic; the fourth and the fifth part will take PRC and Poland for instance to review the author's hypothetic; the sixth part is the conclusion.

參考文獻


弗雷德里克C.、泰韋斯著、王紅緒譯(1990)。從毛澤東到鄧小平。北京:中共中央黨校出版社。
吳玉山(1996)。遠離社會主義:中國大陸、蘇聯和波蘭的經濟轉型。台北:正中。
吳玉山(1995)。共產世界的變遷。台北:三民。
吳敬璉著(1996)。漸進與激進-中國改革道路的選擇。北京:經濟科學出版社。

被引用紀錄


錢蘊瑜(2012)。波蘭前共黨的轉型研究〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2012.00955
張育寧(2007)。經濟全球化與國內政治—中國固定匯率政策的國內分配性效果分析, 1994-2004.〔碩士論文,國立清華大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6843/NTHU.2007.00672
楊穎超(2009)。論中共政權與新興資本家的關係〔博士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2009.02409

延伸閱讀