- 期刊
「現代」與「後現代」爭論的釐清－李歐塔與哈伯瑪斯爭論的基源分析
A Clarification of the Dispute between "Modern" and "Postmodern": A Genetic Analysis of the Dispute between Habermas and Lyotard
並列摘要
This paper attempts to clarify the dispute between ”modern” and ”postmodern” by way of a genetic analysis of the dispute between Habermas and Lyotard. In this analysis, I firstly expound the different views of both and accordingly their different claims of ”modern” and ”postmodern”. Then, I cross-examine their positions through Rorty's reconciliation and criticism to bring oat the meaning of this dispute.
參考文獻
Carnap, R.(1959).Logical Positivism.
J., JurgenHabermas,Habermas(1973).Theory and Practice.
J., JurgenHabermas,Habermas(1980).Contemporary Hermeneutics.
J., JurgenHabermas,Habermas(1986).Autonomy and Solidarity.
JürgenHabermas,Habermas(1981).Modernity versus Postmodernity.New German Critique.22,3-14.
延伸閱讀
- 楊洲松（1998）。哈伯瑪斯（J. Habermas）「現代性哲學論辯」與李歐塔（J-F. Lyotard）「後現代知識論述」的論戰及其教育意義。教育研究集刊，(40)，73-92。https://doi.org/10.6910/BER.199801_(40).0004
- 劉振（2018）。回歸中世紀理性主義：施特勞斯的「古特曼評論」與神學－政治問題。漢語基督教學術論評，(25)，129-150。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=19902670-201806-201807300005-201807300005-129-150
- 龔卓軍（2002）。審美現代性之爭：哈伯瑪斯與傅柯論波特萊爾。中外文學，30(11)，32-61。https://doi.org/10.6637/CWLQ.2002.30(11).32-61
- 林立（2015）。對哈伯瑪斯「人道干預」與「普世價值」思想之釐清。台灣國際法季刊，12(2)，101-119。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=18184185-201506-201701130016-201701130016-101-119
- 李晏佐（2015）。Dionysian Postmodernism? On Habermas's Postmodern Orientation on Nietzsche。政治與社會哲學評論，(53)，97-153。https://doi.org/10.6523/168451532015060053003