透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.226.96.61
  • 期刊

民主化與經濟發展-台灣發展型國家的不成功轉型

Democratization and Economic Development-The Unsuccessful Transformation of Taiwan's Developmental State

摘要


在戰後,台灣及其他東亞國家依靠發展型國家模式而成功地發展了經濟。近年來東亞民主化帶來的變化,是否導致發展型國家模式的解體,是一眾所矚目的議題,而本文主題即是探討民主轉型對台灣發展型國家模式的影響。為了理解政治與經濟轉型的產生背景,本文先對台灣戰後發展型國家的形成與動力作一敘述,指陳國民政府在台灣推動經濟發展的政治意志,源自中國百多年來面對西方與日本挑戰,為了救亡圖存而形構成的現代中華民族主義。發展型國家的政策模式主要包括執政者對經濟發展的堅定支持,經濟官僚體系有能力且具鑲嵌自主性,以整體發展為目標,發展的優先性得在政策協調上顯現。而這些部分在近年則都受到民主化過程的影響。從1980年代開始,台灣政治與經濟方面的轉型幾乎同時進行。本文將民主轉型對於經濟政策轉型的影響分幾方面討論:一是就政策目標之擴大以包容經濟發展以外之考量因素而言,發現民主轉型中社會議題之爭議趨向黨派化,使得社會對如何修正發展優先政策不易形成共識;二是就政策目標是否能持續以整體經濟發展為考量而言,發現民主競爭模式造成之分化及黨派化考量,對此帶來挑戰;三是討論主導性經濟理念的變化,發現民主運動對以往之全盤否定,也導致從以往之發展為先的理念轉變為以新自由主義為主導,無助於對全球化影響的因應;四則論及民主轉型中形成的主流論述,因強調台灣新國族的打造,未能處理台灣經濟重新定位的問題,也使得台灣經濟願景難以形成。雖說過去發展型國家模式確實應該且必須轉型,但至今轉型並非完全成功。

並列摘要


The East Asian tigers relied upon their developmental states (DSs) to achieve extraordinary economic development in the postwar era. Whether these DSs would remain effective after democratization occurred has been a subject of great interest. This paper addresses this question relating to the case of Taiwan. The formation and make-up of Taiwan's DS is discussed first from a historical perspective. It is argued here that the DS's will to develop came from modern Chinese nationalism, which had been formed during China's lengthy process of facing up to the challenge from the West since the Opium War. Taiwan's DS consists of the following features: the ruling elite's will to develop, a capable economic bureaucracy with embedded autonomy, an industrial policy framework with an aim of further overall growth, and an arrangement to coordinate policies to give development top priority. All these facets have been affected by the process of democratization in the last two decades. By the 1980s, the success of Taiwan's development has brought great pressure for it to transform the original economic model and the political institutions at the same time. This paper discuss the impact of democratization on Taiwan's DS in four aspects: in terms of broadening policy objectives to include social concerns besides that of economic development, it is found that the fight over social issues have become too partisan for the society to form a policy consensus; as to whether the policy objective is furthering of overall interests, the new mode of political competition has sometimes led to pursuit of divisive and partisan ways of distributing resources; regarding the guiding principle of economic policy, neo-liberalism has replaced developmentalism as the guide because the democratic movement had adopted neo-liberalism in its fight against authoritarian rule; and finally, because the newly formed democracy discourse is mainly for forging an independent nation and against integration with Mainland China, it hence fails to provide a vision and a feasible future development plan for the Taiwan economy. In sum, the transformation of Taiwan's DS has been less than successful.

參考文獻


中華經濟研究院編()。
王作榮(1964)。尹仲容先生在經濟方面的想法和作法。自由中國之工業。21(1),1-9。
丘延亮編()。
朱雲鵬()。
行政院內政部統計資訊服務網,http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/.

被引用紀錄


周維崇(2018)。橘越淮為枳?歷史空間「活的保存」在海峽兩岸實踐的經驗研究〔博士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2018.00251
黃琪椿(2017)。龍瑛宗接受史與台灣文學研究問題〔博士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2017.00437
夏傳位(2015)。台灣的新自由主義轉向:發展型國家的變異與挑戰〔博士論文,國立清華大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6843/NTHU.2015.00529
陳芙萱(2017)。台灣民主化與發展型國家的轉型:以科學工業園區政治經濟的變遷為例(1980-2017)〔博士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201800588
朱森村(2017)。臺灣政策執行中多階層否決之研究—以核四興建與中科三期開發案為例〔博士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201704084

延伸閱讀