體育與運動的SCI與SSCI

SCI and SSCI in Physical Education, Sport, and Exercise

張育愷(Yu-Kai Chang) ； 祝堅恆(Chien-Heng Chu)

《體育學報》 45卷2期 (2012/06) Pp. 79-91

https://doi.org/10.6222/pej.4502.201206.0701

摘要

科學引文索引（SCI）與社會科學引文索引（SSCI）已成為學術研究的必備知識。本文旨在介紹SCI與SSCI相關的概念，並引入體育與運動學門中SCI與SSCI相關的議題，最後再提出目前對於SCI與SSCI侷限的看法，以及對體育與運動研究者未來的建議。SCI與SSCI是以系統與客觀評估優質期刊為目的，並衍生諸多評價指標；其中，影響指數、學門排序及被引用次數或可成為評估的多重依據。此外，體育與運動的研究者有轉向跨學門的趨勢；而正視英文撰述、提高國際化的思維、真確瞭解各項評價指標的內隱意義，以及由數量轉品質等取向，應可視為未來思量之方向。

關鍵字

引文分析 ； 影響指數 ； 學門排序 ； 被引用次數

並列摘要

Information about Science Citation Index (SCI) and Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) has been recognized as essential knowledge in academia. The aim of this paper was to provide background, relevant issues, and controversial perspectives for the SCI and SSCI as well as their derived evaluation systems to researchers in physical education, sport, and exercise. Limitations and suggestions for the future research of SCI and SSCI were also provided. SCI and SSCI were used to evaluate the quality of journals, systematically and objectively. SCI and SSCI were also derived a variety of evaluation indices where impact factor (IF), category ranking (CR), and timed cited (TC) could function as potential standards for evaluating academic performance. In addition, researchers in physical education, sport, and exercise have increased participating multidisciplinary research. Lastly, improving ability of academic English writing, thinking internationally, understanding the meaning of each evaluation index, and submitting research to the higher quality journal could be considered as the future directions.

並列關鍵字

citation analysis ； category rank ； impact factor ； time cited

參考文獻

洪聰敏、黃毅志 (2009)。國內體育學術期刊之評比。大專體育學刊，11，1-15。

陳曼玲、影耕農 (2010)。拋開SCI 論文數與排名全力提升論文品質－專訪前臺大校長陳維昭。評鑑雙月刊，25，1-3。

溫連雄 (2010)。以英文期刊為學術目的研究國際化的得與失。學校行政，66，51-60。

郭家驊 (2009)。主編的話。大專體育學刊，11(1)，V-VI。

Bensman, S. J. (2007). Garfield and the impactfactor. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41, 93-155.