學術研究上作系統性回顧,可以有類別的歸納、分析與量化數據,幫助研究建立完整文獻回顧內容,強化理論基礎。本研究旨在瞭解自行車研究四大主軸:一、發表年分;二、研究方法;三、學門分類;四、期刊級別。研究方法以內容分析法做為分析理論基礎,先使用Excel表作編碼,再使用SPSS 22版做描述性統計分類,在信度上為.98。研究結果發現自行車研究自2011年後開始大幅增加,其中研究方法多以問卷調查法為主,研究領域多為運動行政與管理學門,期刊級別以未入TSSCI期刊居多。研究結論發現自行車研究常發表在跨領域研究中如機械工程、機械設計與地理資訊等領域,但是在體育、休閒、觀光領域中互動性較強且主題內容較為專一性。未來研究可針對不同運動項目領域作調查,整合不同運動術科領域作跨域研究。
A systematic review of academic research can provide a summary, analysis, and quantitative data to help the study establish a complete literature review and strengthen the theoretical foundation. The purpose of this study was to understand the four major aims of bicycle journals: (1) the year of publication, (2) research methods, (3) classification of schools, and (4) journal level. The research method used the content analysis method as the basis of analysis theory, first used the Excel table for coding, and then uses the SPSS 22 version for descriptive statistical classification. In terms of reliability, the resulting reliability was .98. The research results show that the bicycle research had increased greatly since 2011, and most of the research methods was based on questionnaires. The research fields were mostly sports administration and management, and the journals were not in the TSSCI journals. The study concluded that bicycle journals were often published in cross-disciplinary research such as mechanical engineering, mechanical design, and geographic information, but they were more interactive in the fields of sports, leisure and tourism, and the subject matter was more specific. Future research can be conducted for different sports field areas, integrating different sports science fields for cross-domain research.