透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.135.195.103
  • 期刊

人權、法律、與社會學的觀照-加拿大『印地安寄宿學校和解協定書』與梅帝斯族(Métis)之經驗檢討

Human Rights, Law and Sociological Approaches to Canada's Settlement Agreement on Residential Schools and the Métis Case

摘要


對普世人權價值的講求,隨著全球化的腳步,進入世界各個角落,迫使政府一方面針對國內外剝削勢力加以規範,另一方面對以往政權違反人權的行爲,向受害者致歉並進行救濟。在高舉人權至上的潮流底下,檢視剝削勢力的機制與實踐人權價值的行動,便在法律體系中交會。通常,法律在社會學家的眼中,既可是帶動社會變遷的因素,亦即引導社會變遷的自變項,也可是社會變遷所帶動的一項結果,亦即社會變遷的依變項。換句話說,任何一項法律的變遷不是社會變遷的因,就是社會變遷的果。然而,在高舉普世人權成爲全球化的趨勢之後,各國社會控制機制的執行者與司法體系的行動者,經常扮演著極爲關鍵的守門人與捍衛正義的角色。本文探討加拿大社會之法律行動者對於歷史上所存在的,透過寄宿學校之制度侵害梅帝斯原住民族人權的不正義行動,所展開的一連串救濟行動,及其引發加拿大政府的相關回應。

並列摘要


Along with the footsteps of globalization, the emphasis of universal human rights is becoming active at each quoin of the world. It motivates the national government, on the one hand, to regulate the internal and external forces of exploitation; on the other hand, to address the human rights abuses of the former political power the behavior and to make an apology to the victims. In upholding universal human rights values, the mechanism to inspect the exploitative forces and the practices to implement human rights value meets each other in the legal system of framework. Usually from the perspective of the sociologist, law is not only the impetus to boost social change, but also the fruit born by it. In other words, law is the cause as well as the effect of social change. As upholding universal human rights values turns into a globalized trend, the actors in the judicial system in many countries have put on the role of gatekeepers to safeguard social fairness and justice. With a specific focus on the Métis experience, this article explores how the human rights violation in Canadian history by the forced introduction of European languages, cultures and values to aboriginal people to replace their own through the mechanism of government-funded church-run residential schools has been addressed and corrected by the legal actors and the federal government of Canada in the form of the settlement agreement.

參考文獻


朱柔若(2008)。全球化與台灣社會:人權、法律、與社會學的觀照。台北:三民書局。
傅依傑。2007。〈聯合國通過原住民宣言,美國反對〉《聯合報》9 月15 日(http://mag.udn.com/mag/world/storypage.jsp?f_ART_ID=165402)(2010/3/6)。
施正鋒編、謝若蘭編(2008)。加拿大原住民族的土地權實踐。壽豐:東華大學原住民民族學院。
Barkan, Elazar(2000).The Guilt of Nations: Restitution and Negotiating Historical Injustices.New York:W. W. Norton & Co.
Black, Donald(1989).Sociological Justice.New York:Oxford University.

被引用紀錄


陳柏宏(2017)。臺灣公民社會西進初探-以陸生臺灣經驗為例〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2017.00441
呂惠菁(2015)。新北市實施火炬計畫國民小學新住民學生母語學習狀況之研究〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2015.00797
胡哲瑊(2013)。從告知後同意論高齡者之醫療困境與保障〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu201300780
蔡銘宇(2012)。臺灣原住民族教師對文化公民權的觀點〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315285832
賴瓊美(2012)。藍領外籍勞工管理與諮詢服務執行問題之研究:以中部地區為例〔碩士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201613495665

延伸閱讀