組織靈性議題的研究：靈性健康內涵的探討及應用

靈性評估方式主因來自於個人會因某一事件讓其感受到的壓力及對此案例所作的調適過程，而從事相關自我放鬆行為的靈性活動，該壓力事件所賦予的意義，無形中增加個人身心安適的狀態。這個論點告訴我們：靈性的推動就是以靈性覺醒方式，喚起個人不斷反思、自己反省探究個人的靈性，發掘個體內在的價值，達到靈性健康的境界。玆此，本研究結合質性研究（故事案例的描述）與量化研究方式釐清及驗證國小專任教師靈性健康的內涵、並以階級程序分析法進行，從研究發現中了解喚起國小教師靈性覺醒的關鍵要素為何。最後，根據研究結果提出推動靈性健康具體方案供國小教育行政機關參考之用。

關鍵字

靈性健康；階級程序分析法；靈性健康促進方案

並列摘要

The way of spiritual assessment mainly results from the individuals who feel the pressure due to the specific event are caused by the adaptation process, while engaged in spiritual activities related to self-relaxation behavior. This meaning which is given by the pressured event potentially increases the personal, physical and mental well-being of the state. This argument tells us: spirituality driven by spiritual awakening, arousing individuals constantly reflect on their own self-examination to explore the spirituality of the individual, finding out the individual intrinsic value in reaching the realm of spiritual health.Hereby, this study combined qualitative (event description of the story) and quantitative research to verify this spiritual health of elementary schools teachers connotation and found out the evaluation criteria in this meaning. Then, the researcher checked up this meaning, and then consulted the opinions of experts who were involved in this depressed event. Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) was conducted to simplify the complicated problem evaluation system into precise factor level system. The top seven dominating these practices related to spiritual healthy promotion were offered to the elementary educational institutions reference.

並列關鍵字

Spiritual Health ； Analysis Hierarchy Process ； Spiritual Healthy Promotion

參考文獻

孫效智(2009)。臺灣生命教育的挑戰與願景。課程與教學季刊。12(3)，1-26。

蕭雅竹、簡麗瑜、李香君(2009)。靈性健康促進之策略觀點。中華心理衛生學刊。22(4)，435-450。

就業情報 (2005). "創意工作、金融、教師3大行業最憂鬱," 2012年5月23日，取自http://media.career.com.tw/epaper/enews/center_news.asp?no3=22651

Google Scholar

Bagiella, E.,Hong, V.,Sloan, R. P.(2005).Religious attendance as a predictor of survival in the EPESE cohorts.International Journal of Epidemiology.34(2),443-451.