Purposes: To comparative with 4 major categories of conditioning of muscular strength, flexibility, power, and agility between differences positions (net and baseline) of soft tennis (ST) players. Methods: The volunteers were the male high school ST players (net player n=22, baseline player n=21). Seventeen test items were tested in 2 echelons. Each echelon had last four test days. Each test day tested with 8 to 9 conditioning items. The independent-sample t test were used to analyze the data (α=.05). Results and Conclusions: The net players have better score of agility performance than the baseline players (p<.05). However, there were no different between two groups in the score of muscular strength, flexibility, and power performance.
Purposes: To comparative with 4 major categories of conditioning of muscular strength, flexibility, power, and agility between differences positions (net and baseline) of soft tennis (ST) players. Methods: The volunteers were the male high school ST players (net player n=22, baseline player n=21). Seventeen test items were tested in 2 echelons. Each echelon had last four test days. Each test day tested with 8 to 9 conditioning items. The independent-sample t test were used to analyze the data (α=.05). Results and Conclusions: The net players have better score of agility performance than the baseline players (p<.05). However, there were no different between two groups in the score of muscular strength, flexibility, and power performance.