目的:本研究主要在評估熱身後介入缺血預適應(ischemia preconditioning, IPC)處理,對下蹲跳的運動表現及下肢肌肉柔軟度的立即性影響為何。方法:本研究以12 位體育系健康男性進行5 分鐘慢跑熱身後,即針對參與者雙腿進行IPC 處理(運用束縛帶加壓到220 mmHg,反覆3 回合,回合間休息5 分鐘)。所有依變項須在IPC 處理之前與處理之後進行測量。研究以數位電子量角器測量股四頭肌與腿後腱肌柔軟度,並且在下蹲跳動作測試中,透過高速攝影分析系統測量下肢關節活動範圍,並以測力板量測跳躍高度與地面反作用力。研究數據以Student's t-test 分析評估IPC 介入之前測值及介入後測值之差異情形,顯著水準設定為α = .05。結果:本研究結果顯示,IPC 處理後,對股四頭肌及腿後腱肌柔軟度無提供顯著增進效益(p > .05)及跳躍時下肢關節活動範圍(p> .05)。但IPC 的介入後則會顯著的降低跳躍高度與地面反作用力峰值(p < .05)。結論:本研究推論,在下蹲跳運動之前進行IPC 介入,可能不利於跳躍表現。
Purpose: The study aimed to assess the effect of warm-up incorporating IPC on counter movement jump (CMJ) performance and muscle flexibility. Methods: Twelve healthy college physically activity male volunteers underwent warm-up of 5 minutes running, followed by IPC treatment. The IPC was performed in both upper thighs in turn for 3 cycles of 5-min arterial occlusion using a cuff inflated to 220 mmHg and 5-min relaxation in between. Dependent variables were measured immediately before and after the IPC. A digital inclinometer measured flexibility for quadriceps and hamstrings. A high speed camera and a force plate were used to record the lower extremity kinematics data, CMJ height and ground reaction forces, respectively. The Student's t-test was used to test for differences in dependent variables between baseline and post IPC treatment. Statistical significance was set at α = .05. Results: IPC does not offer any significant benefits for quadriceps and hamstrings flexibility (p > .05). The IPC had no effect on ankle, knee and hip range of motion (p > .05) during the CMJ. The IPC significantly reduced jump height and peak ground reaction force (p < .05) during the CMJ. Conclusions: The repetitive ischemic preconditioning applied to the lower limbs may impair counter movement jump performance.