透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.23.101.41
  • 期刊

部編和民編教科書併行審定制政策之爭議分析

An Analysis of the Controversy over the Policy of Concurrently Reviewing and Approving Publicly and Privately Compiled Textbooks

摘要


民主國家發展進程中,教科書決定教育的思維與走向,尤其在施行九年一貫課程改革後,教科書開放成為課程改革必然需要面對與正視的關鍵問題。然而,從事後趨勢檢證,教科書審定政策的務實推動,包括部編本與民編本併行制,均可能係教育部為減緩教科書開放政策所造成衝擊下應然的微調機制。本文利基於前開基礎,蒐集2002年至2008年間,有關本議題之輿論報導,包含不同民意走向的若干分析,諸如中國時報、聯合報、自由時報、立法院公報、教育部官方文件等,以瞭解中小學教科書發展趨勢,同時進行批判與深度省思,並對國家在教科書市場中的角色定位提出建言,以保證教科書的品質,從課程規劃、編審、試用、選用、使用、評鑑回饋等,建立系列健全機制;由專責課程研發單位,進行長期、系統性的教材研發與紮根性研究,作為成功改革課程及教科書的基礎。

並列摘要


Textbooks determine the thinking and direction of education in developing democratic countries. In Taiwan, especially, since the implementation of the grades 1-9 curriculum reforms, the textbook opening-up policy has become a key issue that must be squarely faced as curriculum reforms are carried out. Following implementation, however, the pragmatic advancement of textbook approval policies, including a parallel system which includes both textbooks compiled by government and private organizations, should be allowed to serve as a fine-tuning mechanism employed by the Ministry of Education(MOE) to mitigate the impact of the textbook opening-up policy. Building on earlier studies, this paper collected reports published between 2002 and 2008 reflecting opinions on this subject, including a number of articles with different slants taken from the China Times, the United Daily News, the Liberty Times, Legislative Yuan communiqués, and official MOE documents to understand trends in the development of textbooks for primary and secondary schools in order to evaluate and carefully consider these trends and further to propose suggestions regarding the role the government should play in the nation’s textbook market to guarantee textbook quality, from curriculum planning, textbook editing, trial use, and selection to evaluation and feedback, to facilitate the establishment of a sound mechanism and an agency tasked with the study and development of curriculum to perform long-term, systematic research and development on teaching materials to serve as grounded research to lay a foundation for the successful reformation of curriculum and textbooks.

參考文獻


戴曉霞(2000)。新世紀高等教育的展望:回顧與前瞻。教育研究集刊。44,35-60。
詹美華(2008)。教科書市場化議題之論述分析。教科書研究。1(2),1-28。
許育典、凌赫(2009)。一綱一本政策的法律分析。當代教育研究。17(1),1-36。
申慧媛(2007,6 月24 日)。中小學部編本教科書不再新增,維持數學及自然兩科。自由時報,10 版
立法院(2002,10 月3 0 日)。委員會紀錄。立法院公報,91(74),343-361

被引用紀錄


張鈺姿(2013)。臺灣中小學教科書私有化政策的政治經濟學分析〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2013.01701
洪唯晃(2017)。高雄市國中教師對電子教科書的認知及使用意願之研究〔碩士論文,義守大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0074-2606201723551800

延伸閱讀