透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.238.5.144
  • 學位論文

東亞整合中的中日關係—兼論中日FTA戰略之比較分析—

Sino-Japanese Relations and East Asia Integration: An Analysis of FTA Strategies

指導教授 : 楊永明

摘要


東亞區域整合的主要推動力量來源,主要可分成三種因素:政治因素、經濟因素以及認同因素。通常此三因素皆同時存在,促進本區域的整合。不過,在每個時期,扮演最主要角色的因素則有所變化。本文根據推動整合的最主要動力,而將東亞整合過程區分為三個階段:1980年中期至1990年末是經濟因素,1990年末至2000年初期是認同因素,2000年以後則是政治因素。目前,東亞區域正值第三個階段,其區域整合的政治特色增加的同時,區域大國的影響力變得愈來愈大。 東亞區域大國,中國與日本的東亞戰略也受到政治、經濟以及認同之三個因素來形成,但是其政治因素扮演的角色相當重要。目前東亞整合以FTAs為主要途徑進展,中國和日本皆積極推動簽訂FTAs,各方也提出自己的東亞多邊FTA構想。值得注意的是,中日兩國在簽署過程中強調自己能提供的「公共財」。現在東亞整合的主導位子還是ASEAN所在,所以中國與日本強調以兩國可以提供的「公共財」吸引ASEAN國家,試圖掌握其區域整合的主導權。中國為「機會」提供「市場」,日本強調為「穩定」的「經驗與技術」。目前,還未達成合議中日共同的東亞多邊自由貿易區構想,兩方提出的東亞多邊自由貿易協議構想正在競逐關係。

並列摘要


There are three forces driving East Asia Integration: Politics, Economy and Identities. Generally speaking, these three forces are simultaneously simultaneously regional integration. But which force is the most influential varies for different periods. Three different periods can be distinguished in the process of East Asia Integration: from mid 1980s on to end of the 1990s when the economy was the major driving force; from the end of the 1990s to the early 2000s when East Asian identity was major driving force; from the early 2000s until now when political were the driving force. Now, East Asia Integration enters the third period, and the importance of politic for regional integration and influence of regional power are increasing. The strategies of China and Japan, both regional powers in East Asia, also emphasize these three components, politic, economic and identity, but the political component plays a significant role. Nowadays, East Asia Integration evolves through FTAs. -China and Japan try to conclude FTAs. Of particular note is that both of China and Japan emphasize “Public Good” which they can supply when they are concluding FTAs. In this region, ASEAN historically lead regional integration and until recently figured prominently in these processes. Both China and Japan try taking the lead of East Asia Integration by supplying “Public Good” and attract ASEAN countries. China offers “huge market” as “chances”, on the other hand, Japan emphasizes their “experiences and skills” as “stability” factor. At present, no consensus about a common East Asia Free Trade Area has been reached, so China and Japan compete against each other toward the Formation of an East Asia FTA.

參考文獻


中國國務院新聞辦公室(http://219.142.85.71/)。
濱下武志,1990,《近代中囯の囯際的契機:朝貢貿易システムと近代アジア》,東京:東京大学出版会。
李國雄,2005,〈中國大陸-東協自由貿易區的政治經濟分析〉,《兩岸共同市場基金會通訊》,第12期。
天児慧,2005,〈中國的『東亜共同體論』・新國際秩序的構想與台湾〉,國立清華大學當代中國研究中心編,《「帝國夾縫中的台灣」國際研討會論文集》,行政院文化建設委員會。
蔡增家,2004,〈日本自民黨再執政基礎的政治經濟分析〉,《人文及社會科學集刊》,第16卷第3期。

被引用紀錄


黃奕婷(2015)。同盟的形成與變遷:冷戰後美日同盟與美韓同盟的中國因素比較分析〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342%2fNTU.2015.00133
吳明學(2015)。中國簽署自由貿易協定發展歷程與戰略動機之研究〔碩士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201614024852

延伸閱讀