公立高職實施教師績效評鑑調查之研究

A Study of the Investigation of Public Senior Vocational School on the Implementation of Teacher Performance Evaluation

曾素絲(Ssu-Su Tseng)

指導教授 ： 曾淑惠

國立臺北科技大學/人文與科學學院/技術及職業教育研究所/碩士(2006年)

摘要

本研究旨在藉由公立高職實施教師績效評鑑調查的整體傾向分析，探討教師的不同背景變項對實施教師績效評鑑目的、範圍與項目、實施程序及方式之意見的差異情形，據此瞭解公立高職教師對實施教師績效評鑑之看法。
研究方法主要採問卷調查，研究工具為「公立高職實施教師績效評鑑調查問卷」以我國九十四學年的台灣地區公立高職教師為母群體。共計發放1500份問卷，有效問卷1311份，有效回收率為87.4%。統計方法採項目分析、信度分析、次數分配、平均數、標準差、百分比分析、單一樣本t考驗、獨立樣本t考驗、單因子變異數分析。經資料處理分析後，獲得以下結論：

一、公立高職實施教師績效評鑑意見的整體傾向顯著高於中等程度。
二、實施教師績效評鑑目的之意見因學校位置的不同有差異，性別、現任職務、服務年資、最高學歷及任教類別則無差異。
三、實施教師績效評鑑範圍之意見因現任職務的不同有差異，性別、服務年資、最高學歷、任教類別及學校位置則無差異。
四、實施教師績效評鑑項目之意見因現任職務、服務年資、最高學歷及任教類別的不同有差異，性別及學校位置則無差異。
五、實施教師績效評鑑程序之意見在性別、現任職務、服務年資、最高學歷、任教類別及學校位置均無差異。
六、實施教師績效評鑑方式之意見因服務年資、最高學歷的不同有差異，性別、現任職務、任教類別及學校位置則無差異。

關鍵字

公立高職 ； 教師績效評鑑

並列摘要

The purpose of this study was the overall analysis to understand current situation of the investigation of public senior vocational school on the implementation of teacher performance evaluation , which explored the differences of the purposes, areas and criterias , process steps and methods of teacher performance evaluation for the teachers of different background variable. According to realizing the investigation of public senior vocational school on the implementation of teacher performance evaluation.
This study was taken by questionnaire survey. Research instrument was ”The table of the opinions of public senior vocational school teachers on teacher performance evaluation”. The population was selected from the teachers of the public senior vocational school at the 94th academic year, which dispatched 1500 copies of questionnaire survey. The valid questionnaire survey were 1311copies, and valid return ratio was 87.4%. Statistical techniques were item analysis, confidence analysis, frequency distribution, mean, standard deviation, percentage analysis, one-sample t-test, independent samples t-test, one-way ANOVA. The major findings of this study are as follows:
1. There is more significant opinions of public senior vocational school on the implementation of teacher performance evaluation, which is higher than medium level for the teachers of public senior vocational school.
2. The opinion of the purposes on the implementation of teacher performance evaluation is significant differences in location, except for gender, duty, seniority, educational background, and category of teaching.
3. The opinion of the areas on the implementation of teacher performance evaluation is significant differences in duty, except for gender, seniority, educational background, category of teaching, and location.
4. The opinions of the criterias on the implementation of teacher performance evaluation are significant differences in duty, seniority, educational background, and category of teaching, except for gender and location.
5. The opinions of the process steps on the implementation of teacher performance evaluation aren’t significant differences in gender, duty, seniority, educational background, category of teaching, and location.
6. The opinions of the methods on the implementation of teacher performance evaluation are significant differences in seniority and educational background, except for gender, duty, category of teaching, and location.

並列關鍵字

public senior vocational school ； teacher performance evaluation

參考文獻

吳清山（民89），學校績效責任的理念與策略。學校行政雙月刊，6，3-13。

姜添輝（民86），英國的學校課程與教育改革。國立新竹師範學院初等教育學報，5，95-127。

張德銳（民92），我國中小學教師評鑑的規劃與推動策略。教育資料與研究雙月刊，53，1-19。

中華民國教育學會（民87），教育評鑑。台北：師大書苑。

朱淑雅（民87），國民小學教師評鑑效標之研究。國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。