透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.191.165.129
  • 學位論文

吳瑪悧《台北明天還是一個湖》(2008)的創作意涵與社會實踐

The Creative Implication and Social Action in Ma-Li Wu’s Work: “Taipei Tomorrow as a Lake Again” (2008)

指導教授 : 廖仁義

摘要


近年來,在臺灣以「參與」和「帶來改變」作為其藝術行動發展重心的藝術家-吳瑪悧,受邀參加2008年台北雙年展。吳瑪悧的參展作品「對話性創作」-《台北明天還是一個湖》,除了運用了她所擅長的社群對話模式之外,也藉由這個行動式的藝術作品,擴張了藝術對話的領域與群體。整個藝術計畫大規模且跨組織的整合資源與動員,結合了美術館(公部門)、企業、第三部門、藝術家、民眾以及社區組織。 吳瑪悧自2002年起,開始轉變其藝術創作的思考脈絡,創作思維從個人表現性轉而朝向強調藝術的社會性。藝術創作的主體,從藝術家自身慢慢擴及至社會各個層面與社群,並思考藝術家與社會的關係,甚至轉化為積極的社會�文化行動。吳瑪悧在2008台北雙年展所提出的作品《台北明天還是一個湖》,主張經由實踐「對話」的過程,得以建構出一個公共關係與社群結構。 個人作為《台北明天還是一個湖》的展覽執行人員,身處作品中各主體鏈結的核心,本研究乃是根據自身實際參與作品創作過程的經驗,以梳理與分析該作品的創作意涵與社會實踐之過程。本研究從組織化的藝術創作過程作為切入角度,檢視藝術家主體在強調「過程性」、「對話性」的創作過程中逐漸弱化之現象,並探究「藝術」與「行政」二者關係的辯證。本研究並進一步提出觀察:「對話性創作」的作品發生場域,從館外(社區)模式進入到「美術館體制」之後,「藝術」與「展示」的本質不斷地產生衝撞與妥協,美術館與「對話性創作」二者是否可能或應該接合,將是藝術工作者與美術館體制未來所必須共同面對之嚴峻考驗。

並列摘要


Mali Wu, the artist whose development of art action in Taiwan has revolved around “change” “and making a difference” in the recent years, was invited to join the 2008 Taipei Biennial. Utilizing her mastery of the mode of “community dialogue,” her work of “Dialogic Creation”—“Taipei Tomorrow as a Lake Again”—expands the domain and community of artistic dialogue through this very work of action art. The whole project integrates and mobilizes resources in an extensive and cross-organizational manner, associating the fine arts museum (the public sector), the enterprises, the third sector, the artist, the public and the community organizations. Ever since 2002, Mali Wu has changed the thinking context of her art creation, with her creative thinking moving from personal expression to the art-focused sociality. The subject of art creation is gradually extended from the artist herself to the all the various aspects and communities of the society, while she contemplates on the relationship between the artist and the society and even transforms her thinking into active social/cultural actions. Her entry for the 2008 Taipei Biennial, “Taipei Tomorrow as a Lake Again”, advocates that, through practicing the process of “dialogue,” a public structure of relationships and communities can be constructed. As executive staff of the display of “Taipei Tomorrow as a Lake Again”, I am in the hub of the work where all the subjects are linked. Therefore, this research is based on the writer’s personal experience in participating the creative process of the work so as to sort out and analyze the creative implication of the work and its process of social practice. Here we approach this artwork with an eye on the organization of the process of art creation, inquire the how the artist’s subjectivity is weakened in the “process-oriented” and “dialogue-oriented” creative process, and discuss the dialectical relationship between “art” and “administration.” Furthermore, it is observed that after a work of “dialogic creation” is admitted into the “institution of museums”, the essence of “art” and the nature of “exhibitions” are plunged into constant clashes and compromises. Whether museums and “dialogic creation” could or should be joined together is a harsh test that art workers and the museum institution must face together.

參考文獻


2005,〈從「藝術社會化」探討「新公共藝術」反映真實的美學〉,《造形藝術學刊》,頁59-74。
2008,〈從後現代看公共藝術與當代在地社群的認同-少數族裔的再現〉,《議藝份子》,卷10,頁113-123。
Adorno, Theodor W.
Barthes, Roland
Baudrillard, Jean

被引用紀錄


吳盈潔(2012)。「美術鑑賞」通識課程之對話藝術創作學習探究〔碩士論文,國立臺北藝術大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6835/TNUA.2012.00085
葉于璇(2011)。社群藝術創作的特質及其藝術教育意義-以吳瑪悧社群藝術創作為例之個案研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315252698

延伸閱讀