國小教師在職進修方式與教師效能之研究

A Study on In-service Education and Teachers Effectiveness of Elementary School Teachers---A Case Study on Kaohsiung Metropolis, Kaohsiung County and Pingtung County

余惠婷(Yu Hui-ting)

指導教授 ： 翁福元

國立暨南國際大學/教育學院/成人與繼續教育研究所/碩士(2006年)

https://doi.org/10.6837/NCNU.2006.00008

摘要

教師專業成長管道中，在職進修為其一，藉由進修教師可以精進實際的教學能力，亦有助於教師思考的成長。
本研究旨在瞭解高雄市、高雄縣和屏東縣國小教師進修方式與教師效能之現況，並從不同背景變項教師與進修方式，探討教師效能的差異情形。
研究工具採用國小教師在職進修方式與教師效能問卷蒐集研究所需的資料，問卷內容包括個人背景、學校背景和教師效能量表，個人背景包含性別、年齡、現任職務、服務年資、最高學歷，學校背景有學校規模和服務學校縣市，教師效能量表內容包括教學方法、課程編排、行動研究、班級經營與親師互動等五個層面。
正式樣本有高雄市、高雄縣和屏東縣市國小教師，發出900份問卷，採分層比例隨機抽樣抽出44所學校，回收730份，回收率81%，將所得資料進行t檢定、雙因子變異數分析和迴歸預測。
研究結果顯示高雄市、高雄縣和屏東縣市國小教師之整體教師效能得分情形在中上程度，教師進修方式以一般進修最多，就教師背景而言，不同現任職務、服務年資和服務學校縣市教師在整體教師效能與教師效能有差異，背景變項與進修方式對教師效能無交互作用存在，參與不同進修方式教師，其教師效能沒有顯著差異。

關鍵字

國小教師、教師效能、在職進修

並列摘要

In-service education is one of the ways of teachers’ professional growth. Teachers can improve teacher teaching ability and teacher thinking by participating in in-service education.
The study aims to explore the current situation of in-service way and teacher effectiveness in elementary school teacher of Kaohsiung Metropolis, Kaohsiung County, and Pingtung County. And, from the data, it analyzes the relationship among context variables, in-service way and teacher.
The research instrument which is developed by the author according to some related survey is in-service education way and teacher effectiveness questionnaire. The questionnaire has personal background, school background and teacher effectiveness scale. Sex, age, job, year and degree are included in personal background. School scale and school place are included in school background. Teacher effectiveness scale has five factors.
A total of 900 subjects are drawn from 44 schools in Kaohsiung Metropolis, Kaohsiung County and Pingtung County and collected sampling is 730 that collection rate reaches 81%. The statistical methods employed in the study are t-test, two-way ANOVA and regression analysis.
The result as follows：
1. The whole teacher effectiveness in Kaohsiung Metropolis, Kaohsiung County and Pingtung County is good.
2. Among in-service ways, general in-service education is the most of three.
3. As for background factors, there are differences between whole teacher effectiveness and teacher effectiveness among job, year, and place.
4. Background variables and in-service way have no interaction on teacher effectiveness.
5. There are no differences among teacher effectiveness of in-service ways.
6. Among variables, job and year are predicators of teacher effectiveness.

並列關鍵字

elementary school teacher、teacher effectiveness、in-service education

參考文獻

一、中文文獻

王淑珍（2005）。國小教師行動研究及其對教師效能感影響之研究。市立臺北師範學院教育行政與評鑑研究所碩士論文，未出版。

王受榮（1995）。我國國民中小學教師效能感及其影響因素之研究。台灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文，，未出版。

史詩琪（2001）。新竹市國民小學教師在職進修現況與需求之調查研究。新竹師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。

朱陳翰思（2002）。國民小學教師自我效能感與專業知能關係之研究。台中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。