建置緩起訴處分的刑事處遇機制

Using Suspended Prosecution as Criminal Treatment Mechanism

洪清秀(CHING-SHOW HONG)

指導教授 ： 周愫嫻

國立臺北大學/社會科學學院/犯罪學研究所/碩士(2016年)

摘要

本論文先從探討犯罪行為人受情緒、習慣等思惟模式的影響，再探討轉向刑事處遇較刑事處罰有利於改變犯罪行為人的行為，以及緩起訴處分附刑事處遇之機制是現行刑事訴訟法裡最具彈性及能妥善運用的處遇制度。是故，如何建置緩起訴處分的刑事處遇機制即是非常重要之課題。
本文透過訪談社會工作的解決辦法，再參考少年事件處理法的處遇機制，以及訪談現行毒品戒癮治療、修復式司法之成功機制，以企業管理之企劃方式提出改變組織文化及擴大處遇與大幅減少監禁的具體目標，以及在具體策略上成立處遇工作委員會、引進專業社工等之觀護人力，加上建置處遇專組、處遇流程及相關處遇教育訓練等機制，並透過擬定預期成果及實際執行之重點，建置完整的緩起訴處分的刑事處遇機制。
本研究主要發現如下：
一、犯罪行為的成因除了理性選擇外，尚有情緒、習慣等之情感面向。
二、透過刑事處遇機制較能處理犯罪行為人背後的情緒、習慣等的思惟模式。
三、緩起訴處分附刑事處遇之機制是現行法制裡最能發揮運用之機制。
四、透過建置處遇委員會、引進社工人力、成立專組、處遇流程及教育訓練等機制，能完善緩起訴處分的刑事處遇機制。
五、建置完整的緩起訴處分的刑事處遇機制，會形成新的組織文化，進而改變檢察機關以刑罰為優先的組織文化。

關鍵字

刑事處遇 ； 刑事處罰 ； 緩起訴 ； 組織文化

並列摘要

The purpose of the present study is to propose a treatment-oriented criminal justice system as opposed to the current inefficient and unsatisfactory system of punishment. In order to do so, the study argues that the overall purpose and organizational culture of the prosecution office has to be changed from punishment/retribution to management/rehabilitation. By interviewing prosecutors and judges and referencing existing juvenile diversion treatments and restorative justice programs, this study advocates the expansion of treatment for all minor crimes by better utilization of suspended prosecutions.
Five main arguments were illustrated and argued for this study:
(1) crime is not only caused by rational choice, but also by emotional and habitual irrationality;
(2) prison sentencing might deter some rational criminals, but have no effect on those whose crimes cab be better seen as crimes of emotional and habitual in nature;
(3) for those passionate and habitual criminals, criminal treatment programs work better towards rehabilitation. In terms of the criminal justice process, suspended prosecution is the best and easiest legal channel for them to receive treatments;
(4) to encourage prosecutors to employ a wider range of criminal treatments, the prosecution office has to make the system more “user-friendly” by establishing a specialized case processing committee, a social work supporting team, a group of prosecutors who are familiar with the process of treatment decision making, a treatment standardized operational procedure, as well as on-job training programs; and finally
(5) once the above criminal treatment mechanism is established, it will help to change the organizational culture within the prosecution offices and be adopted by the individual prosecutors. Organisational change is key to this proposal.
Keywords: criminal treatment, criminal punishment, suspended prosecution, organizational culture.

並列關鍵字

criminal treatment ； criminal punishment ； suspended prosecution ； organizational culture

參考文獻

朴用喆（2014）情緒習慣，決定你的一生。臺北市：方智。

林東茂（2006）刑法綜覽。臺北市：一品文化。

Ariely, Dan，姜雪影譯（2011）不理性的力量。臺北市：遠見、天下文化。

參考書目

Cortman, Christopher and Harold Shinitzky，黃孝如譯（2014）心靈療癒自助手冊。臺北市：遠見天下。